If they won't commit...don't VOTE them BACK TO DO MORE DAMAGE...THAT IS YOUR POWER!
If they won't commit...don't relect them...THAT IS YOUR POWER!

To Congress, The 5 Pledges

1. I believe in a balanced budget and therefore will vote for a freeze in government spending until that goal is realized.

2. I believe government should not increase the financial burden on its citizenry during  difficult economic times, therefore I will oppose all tax increases until our economy has rebounded.

3. I believe more than four decades of US dependence on foreign oil is a travesty, therefore I will support an energy plan that calls for immediately increasing usage of all domestic resources including nuclear energy, natural gas and coal as necessary.

4. I believe in the sovereignty and security of our country and therefore will support measures to close our borders except for designated immigration points so we will know who is entering and why. I will vehemently oppose any measure giving another country, the United Nations, or any other entity power over US citizens.

5. I believe the United States of America is the greatest country on earth and therefore will not apologize for policies or actions which have served to free more and feed more people around the world than any other nation on the planet.

Undercover investigation featuring prostitution, sex trafficking, tax evasion, and money laundering.
Song ‘Ridiculous’ copyright ©2009 Anthony Dini. Used with permission.
http://www.myspace.com/anthonydinimusic


This is the organization that Obama let into the White House’s decision making process..JUST THINK what they could do for YOUR ILLEGAL OPERATION! This is outrageous that Obama and the Dem’s keep using these scum-bags to get advice…WHY???

Glenn Beck: In or Out 2010
If your politician doesn’t believe, support or reflect these beliefs in their actions then they aren’t supporting you. More importantly, they aren’t supporting, protecting or defending the Constitution

Click if you witness an Anti-Constitutional action from Washington at any time!
Click if you witness an Anti-Constitutional action from Washington at any time!

I think this video speaks for itself. The “New” (moronic) Communists came to support Barbara Boxer and Obama. The REAL people who have lived under Communism and Socialism react. And get this…this is in SAN FRANCISCO!!

Are we still denying that Obama is a Socialist?

Documentarian John Ziegler talks to NBCs Matt Lauer about a new film that blames the media for Gov. Sarah Palin’s loss in the 2008 election. Zieglers film, Media Malpractice: How Obama got elected and Palin was targeted!


In case you think that Obama was a Genius…think back some he said he visited 57 states, why didn’t the Media call that Stupid? Or what about the FACT that his wife had never been proud to be an American, until he ran for President. Was this not worthy of asking WHY from the Media? The media coverage of the election of 2008 was ridiculous and the abuses by the main stream media for their own agenda were revolting to watch, they were IN THE TANK for Obama and NOTHING HE OR HIS WIFE SAID OR DID was worthy of rebuke…..those are facts!

THE AGENDA of Obama (And the FARRRRRR Left) IN HIS OWN WORDS! CLICK HERE NOW……


Each President is confronted with new and unique challenges, BUT Obama has really hit the agenda ceiling hard with support for the LGBT Community…that’s the Lesbian, Gay, bisexual and trans-gender community. Learn more about what the Obama-Biden Administration’s TRUE positions are on everything from health care and the economy to alternative energy and foreign policy….TOLD YOU SO!!!! The sky is falling, the sky is falling, we need to spend money, and a lot of it, and we need to do it now. That’s all you hear from these guys, they’re trying to scare us into letting them do what ever they want, whether its good for us or not.

Keynesian Economics Is Wrong: Bigger Gov’t Is Not Stimulus!

Based on a theory known as Keynesianism, politicians are resuscitating the notion that more government spending can stimulate an economy. This mini-documentary produced by the Center for Freedom and Prosperity Foundation examines both theory and evidence and finds that allowing politicians to spend more money is not a recipe for better economic performance.

Please someone out there tell me how the government taking our money, and then spending it, is going to simulate the economy better than letting us spend it ourselves? Is not the money going to be spent one way or another? Is it not more efficient to keep the middle man out of this deal? Why take money from the people to create jobs? Why not just let us keep our money so that we can create jobs?

Winston Churchill one said that a government trying to spend its self into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up, and I agree.

The fact of the matter is that this “stimulus” bill is not going to stimulate the economy. Its nothing but the Democrats way of expanding government, which has always been there goal. Only 3% of the spending in this Bill will have a stimulating affect on the economy in 2009, so therefore it is not a stimulus Bill, period. Also if only 3% will stimulate the economy this year, then why are they in such a hurry to get it pasted with so little debate? Could it be that they are afraid the American people will catch on to them, and discover that the whole thing is nothing but a pork laden spending bill that will not help the country get out of its economic difficulties, and that it might even hurt our chances of recovery.

A Bill like this is not needed. They need to go back to the drawing table and produce a real stimulus Bill, if there is such a thing.


States to win big in stimulus sweepstakes

The economic stimulus plan now moving through Congress would shower billions of federal dollars on state and local governments desperate for cash.

The House stimulus bill includes an extra $87 billion in federal aid to state Medicaid programs, for instance. It allots some $120 billion to boost state and city education programs.

Theres $4 billion for state and local anti-crime initiatives in the legislation, not to mention $30-plus billion for highways and other infrastructure projects.

Overall, about one-quarter of the entire $825 billion recovery package would be devoted to activities crucial to governors, mayors, and local school boards making them among the plans biggest beneficiaries.

Such aid will help needy Americans keep their healthcare, and help teachers, police officers, and other public employees keep their jobs, say Obama administration officials.

Critics say Uncle Sam is about to allocate huge sums to bail out many states and cities that got themselves in trouble by overspending in boom times.

It will reward states that have behaved irresponsibly, says Brian Riedl, a senior fellow in budgetary affairs at the Heritage Foundation.

http://features.csmonitor.com/economy…

Kucinich: Economic Stimulus Package Needs To Focus On States And Localities That Need Help The Most

WASHINGTON – January 17 – Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) released the following statement concerning the economic stimulus package being proposed to jumpstart the economy:

We have to provide relief to American families. It is this Congress responsibility to offer support for middle class families and strengthen our economy, Kucinich said.

The subprime lending-induced housing market collapse coupled with the slowdown in the economy will mean big losses in property tax and sales tax revenue. Infrastructure is often the first cost to be abandoned.

When considering an economic package that will help us avoid a recession, Congress should consider taking up the Kucinich/LaTourette Infrastructure Bill.

On August 3, 2007, Kucinich and Congressman Steve LaTourette (R-OH), introduced a bipartisan infrastructure bill to improve critical infrastructure in Ohio and nationwide.

http://www.commondreams.org/news2008/…

How is it a stimulus package to jolt this economy when most of it won’t be spent at all on the economy in the near future?

Now the truth of Hyperinflation is now revealed to you. Whether you are American or a foreigner. Its about time someone told the truth about why printing money will not work.

Thank God for the President

Here’s Why from a great post on Sodahead.com HERE:

Written by a 82-year-old very wise lady. She gives us a whole new slant on the amazing job Obama is doing:
That is right – I will say it — “THANK GOD FOR THE PRESIDENT.”

1. He destroyed the Clinton Political Machine –

driving a stake through the heart of Hillary’s Presidential aspirations -something that no Republican was ever able to do. Remember when a Hillary Presidency scared the daylights out of you!

2. He killed off the Kennedy Dynasty –

no more Kennedys trolling Washington looking for booze and women wanting rides home. American women and freedom are safer tonight!

3. He is destroying the Democratic Party before our eyes!


Dennis Moore had never lost a race – quit

Evan Bayh had never lost a race – quit

Byron Dorgan had never lost a race – quit

Harry Reid – soon to be GONE

These are just a handful of the Democrats whose political careers Obama has destroyed! By the end of 2010, dozens more will be gone.

In December of 2008, the Democrats were on the rise. In the last two election cycles, they had picked up 14 senate seats and 52 house seats.

The press was touting the death of the Conservative Movement and the Republican Party. In just one year, Obama put a stop to all of this and will probably give the House, if not the Senate, back to the Republicans.

4. He has completely exposed liberals and progressives for what they are. Every generation seems to need to re-learn the lesson on why they should never actually put liberals in charge. He is bringing home the lesson very well.


Liberals tax, borrow, and spend – check

Liberals can’t bring themselves to protect America – check

Liberals want to take over the economy – check

Liberals think they know what is best for everyone – check

Liberals aren’t happy until they are running YOUR life – check

5. Obama has brought more Americans back to conservatism than anyone since Reagan.

In one year, he has rejuvenated the conservative movement and brought out to the streets millions of freedom-loving Americans. Name one other time in your life when you saw your friends and neighbors this interested in taking back America!

6. His amazing leadership has sparked the greatest period of sales of firearms and ammunition this country has seen. Law-abiding citizens have rallied and have provided a “stimulus” to the sporting goods field while other industries have failed, faded or moved off-shore.

7. In all honesty, one year ago I was more afraid than I have been in my life. Not of the economy but of the direction our country was going.

I thought Americans had forgotten what this country was all about. My neighbors, friends and strangers proved to me that my lack of confidence of the greatness and wisdom of the American people was flat wrong.

8. When the American people wake up, no smooth-talking teleprompter reader can fool them!

So…What is a Loon? The Dictionary defines being a Loon as: “a crazy or simple-an-garbage_can_smelly_lg_wht1minded person.”   But just what do I mean by calling some political pundit’s “Loons”? Most all of the Far Left wing and Far Right pundits out there are Loony toons” over their candidate, and the sane thinking and fair mindedness is NOWHERE to be found in anything they write or think. Take for just an example the excess of spending and Garbage (something STINKS and it ain’t in Denmark) at the recent inauguration ceremony…….click here!

baracksocialismeyes1Being a “Loon” is both “color blind” as far as Red or Blue politically speaking and “Blind” as far as He or She who WILL NOT SEE is concerned. It doesn’t matter what color you are or what walk of life your in ( Black, White, or Hollywood Elite ) the same result comes from being frozen in a time frame (The 60’s) or being just a plain factual Liar who wouldn’t know the real truth if it were sitting in a room full of ARROWS POINTING AT IT.

You see its not about BEING a Liberal or BEING a republican or even BEING a Centrist, it’s really about being an AMERICAN FIRST and foremost, seeing our views through the clear thinking of what’s best for ALL AMERICANS…..THE WHOLE COUNTRY vs. The few Loudmouths out there that think their BETTER than the Majority of the country and can in effect lead us down the “primrose path” of destruction and call it something that’s better for the country.2008_04_pastor

As I go along in the day…..reading the pure “Garbage” out there disguised as knowledge about someone THEY PERSONALLY HATE, it really gets old fast….When are these “Fool’s” going to get it? It seems simple enough to me …..Americans are FED UP with the FED’S TELLING US, (THE ONES WHO PAY OUT THE NOSE TO BUY THEIR PENSIONS, FAST CARS, FAST AFFAIRS both Political and Personal) to PAY EVEN MORE and somehow call it a day’s work! Maybe the best place for Congress to be IS ON VACATION, because heaven knows they haven’t accomplished ANYTHING in the past 16 or more years despite being Left sided or Right sided…..Am I right? Blaming it ALL on The Clinton’s or Blaming it ALL on Bushes is just a cheap way to get out of REALLY HAVING AN ANSWER TO THE MESS WE ALL CREATED AS A WHOLE TOGETHER! The problem’s are CLEAR CUT and the Answers must be as well.

affirm5Getting in a personal “Bash for all” like they did to Sarah Palin and pointing fingers is nothing short of “Simple Mindedness” that even a child grows out of with good adult supervision, which congress doesn’t seem to have had in the last 30 or so years.

Our Government is exhibiting a sense of extreme folly; senselessness; and foolhardiness of drunken sailors or Insane patients running a hospital. It is as the Constitution says, time for us to replace what isn’t working with that which will work and I DO NOT MEAN THE SAME OLD PARTY POLITICS AS USUAL FROM BOTH SIDES but a grass roots of people who are sick of the status quo of politician and who demand REAL change not “Political Spin Doctors” who can make the Bad sound good! Let’s face it America our political system is seriously Broken and must be overhauled by like minded Americans who put country first and “Political Affiliations” dead LAST.                                                                                                                                                                                            I know that ALL Dem’s are not created equal as far as “Loon Agendas” and that not all “Right Wingers” are the same. BUT THAT BEING SAID THESE ISSUES ARE VERY IMPORTANT AND BEYOND A MERE AGENDA DRIVEN POLITICAL PARTY. After all, just because you think it should be the “Norm” doesn’t mean it is normal and no amount of lies or stretching of the facts can make it right.

I’ve noticed a trend develop in the last year or so in the campaigns as a whole butayers1especially from the Obama camp about certain key facts that link him to things which bring into serious question his judgment to be the  President of the U.S. And contrary to what Liberals call this, it is obvious to anyone which has two eyes that can see that Obama has side tracked ANY QUESTION to his character as a PERSONAL ATTACK rather than a real issue of PERSONAL JUDGMENT.

Just who is William Charles “Bill” Ayers?

Obama OPENED HIS RUN FOR THE WHITE HOUSE AT WILLIAM ARES HOME!!! William Ares is STILL an UNREPENTANT terrorist. He admittedly bombed the pentagon in the 60’s and after 9-11 said he wished he had done a better job of it. This one problem alone is enough to disqualify anyone from any job let alone the Presidency of the United States. Its one thing to have personal family issues AND ASSOCIATIONS like those in prison ministries where you must befriend felons, but it is a far greater problem to have ties to ANYONE who wishes America harm even in the past and deny it to our face. You liberals can cry foul all you want but this is serious and you know that if a republican had ties to him, even in a small way you would crucify them without mercy. So don’t be hypocrites when your man has friendships that are Un-American…..remember your a an AMERICAN FIRST a Liberal 2nd…..RIGHT?

ayers-dorhmmAccording to Wikipedia “Ayers became involved in the New Left and the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). He rose to national prominence as an SDS leader in 1968 and 1969. As head of an SDS regional group, the “Jesse James Gang”, Ayers made decisive contributions to the Weatherman orientation toward militancy.The group Ayers headed in Detroit, Michigan became one of the earliest gatherings of what became the Weatherman. Between the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago and the June 1969 SDS convention, Ayers became a prominent leader of the group, which arose as a result of a schism in SDS.”During that time his infatuation with street fighting grew and he developed a language of confrontational militancy that became more and more pronounced over the year [1969]”, disaffected former Weatherman member Cathy Wilkerson wrote in 2001. Ayers had previously become a roommate of Terry Robbins, a fellow militant, Wilkerson wrote. Robbins would later be killed while making a bomb.In June 1969, the Weatherman took control of the SDS at its national convention, where Ayers was elected Education Secretary. Later in 1969, Ayers participated in planting a bomb at a statue dedicated to riot police casualties in the 1886 Haymarket Riot confrontation between labor supporters and the police. The blast broke almost 100 windows and blew pieces of the statue onto the nearby Kennedy Expressway. (The statue was rebuilt and unveiled on May 4, 1970, and blown up again by other Weathermen on October 6, 1970. Rebuilding it yet again, the city posted a 24-hour police guard to prevent another blast.) Ayers participated in the Days of Rage riot in Chicago in October 1969, and in December was at the “War Council” meeting in Flint, Michigan. Larry Grathwohl, an FBI informant in the Weatherman group from the fall of 1969 to the spring of 1970, thought that “Ayers, along with Bernardine Dohrn, probably had the most authority within the Weatherman”.

Years underground

In 1970 he “went underground” with several associates after theroot_for_usGreenwich Village townhouse explosion, in which Weatherman member Ted Gold, Ayers’ close friend Terry Robbins, and Ayers’ girlfriend, Diana Oughton, were killed when a nail bomb (an anti-personnel device) they were assembling exploded. Kathy Boudin and Cathy Wilkerson survived the blast. Ayers was not facing criminal charges at the time, but the federal government later filed charges against him. Ayers participated in the bombings of New York City Police Headquarters in 1970, the United States Capitol building in 1971, and The Pentagon in 1972, as he noted in his 2001 book, Fugitive Days. Because of a water leak caused by the Pentagon bombing, aerial bombardments during the Vietnam War had to be halted for several days. Ayers writes:

Although the bomb that rocked the Pentagon was itsy-bitsy – weighing close to two pounds – it caused ‘tens of thousands of dollars’ in damage. The operation cost under $500, and no one was killed or even hurt, but is that really the point? We all know that if we normal citizens just hold back a dime in taxes the I.R.S. WILL MAKE OUR LIVES HELL FOREVER.

b68e2While underground, he and fellow member Bernardine Dohrn married, and the two remained fugitives together, changing identities, jobs and locations. By 1976 or 1977, with federal charges against both fugitives dropped due to prosecutorial misconduct (WAY DA’ GO MORON PROSECUTION), Ayers was ready to turn himself in to authorities, but Dohrn remained reluctant until after she gave birth to two sons, one born in 1977, the other in 1980. “He was sweet and patient, as he always is, to let me come to my senses on my own”, she later said. The couple turned themselves in to authorities in 1980. Ayers and Dohrn later became legal guardians to the son of former Weathermen David Gilbert and Kathy Boudin after the boy’s parents were convicted and sent to prison for their part in the Brinks Robbery of 1981.

Weatherman, known colloquially as the Weathermen and later the Weather Underground Organization, was an American radical left organization founded in 1969 by leaders and members who split from the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS).The group is most famous for a campaign consisting of bombings, jailbreak, and riots, from 1969 through the middle 1970s. The “Days of Rage”, the group’s first public demonstration on October 8, 1969, was a riot in Chicago coordinated with the trial of the Chicago Eight. In 1970 the group issued a “Declaration of a State of War” against the United States government, under the name “Weather Underground Organization” (WUO). The bombing attacks were mostly against government buildings, along with several banks. Most were preceded by communiqués that provided evacuation warnings, along with statements of the particular matter to which their attacks were allegedly responding. For the bombing of the United States Capitol on March 1, 1971, they issued a statement saying it was “in protest of the US invasion of Laos.” For the bombing of The Pentagon on May 19, 1972, they stated it was “in retaliation for the US bombing raid in Hanoi.” For the January 29, 1975 bombing of the Harry S Truman Building housing the United States Department of State, they stated it was “in response to escalation in Vietnam.”( So…an eye for an eye is okay for Liberals but not for a Wise all knowing God of the Bible? Hmmmm…I’ll have to remember that the next time a liberal Atheist condemns The Almighty for the Old Testament doctrine of “an eye for an eye”)The Weathermen grew out of the Revolutionary Youth Movement (RYM) within the SDS, splitting off to pursue a more radical agenda. It took its name from the lyric “You don’t need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows,” from the Bob Dylan song Subterranean Homesick Blues. They also used this lyric as the title of a position paper they distributed at an SDS convention in Chicago on June 18, 1969. The founding document called for a “white fighting force” to be allied with the “Black Liberation Movement” and other radical movements to achieve “the destruction of US imperialism and achieve a classless world: world communism.”365612821The bombing campaign led the FBI and most other reliable sources to describe their organization as a “Domestic Terrorist group.”

One of the first acts of the Weathermen after splitting from SDS was to announce they would hold the “Days of Rage” that autumn. This was advertised to “Bring the war home!” Hoping to cause sufficient chaos to “wake” the American public out of what they saw as complacency toward the role of the US in the Vietnam War, the Weathermen meant it to be the largest protest of the decade. They had been told by their regional cadre to expect thousands to attend; however, when they arrived they found only a few hundred people. According to Bill Ayers, “The Days of Rage was an attempt to break from the norms of kind of acceptable theatre of ‘here are the anti-war people: containable, marginal, predictable, and here’s the little path they’re going to march down, and here’s where they can make their little statement.’ We wanted to say, “No, what we’re going to do is whatever we had to do to stop the violence in Vietnam.'”Shortly before the demonstrations, they blew up a statue in Chicago built to commemorate police casualties incurred in the 1886 Haymarket Riot. The blast broke nearly 100 windows and scattered pieces of the statue onto the Kennedy Expressway below. The statue was rebuilt and unveiled on May 4, 1970, only to be blown up by the Weathermen a second time on October 6, 1970. The statue was rebuilt once again and Mayor Richard J. Daley posted a 24-hour police guard to protect it.Though the October 8, 1969 rally in Chicago had failed to draw as many as theayers-wright_obamaWeathermen had anticipated, the two or three hundred who did attend shocked police by rioting through the affluent Gold Coast neighborhood. They smashed the windows of a bank and those of many cars. The crowd ran four blocks before encountering police barricades. They charged the police but broke into small groups; more than 1,000 police counter-attacked. Many protesters were wearing motorcycle or football helmets, but the police were well trained and armed. Large amounts of tear gas were used, and at least twice police ran squad cars into the mob. The rioting lasted approximately half an hour, during which 28 policemen were injured (none seriously). Six Weathermen were shot by the police and an unknown number injured; 68 rioters were arrested.For the next two days, the Weatherman held no rallies or protests. Supporters of the RYM II movement, led by Klonsky and Noel Ignatin, held peaceful rallies in front of the federal courthouse, an International Harvester factory, and Cook County Hospital. The largest event of the Days of Rage took place on Friday, October 9, when RYM II led an interracial march of 2,000 people through a Spanish-speaking part of Chicago.On October 10, the Weatherman attempted to regroup and resume their demonstrations. About 300 protesters marched through The Loop, Chicago’s main business district, watched by a double-line of heavily armed police. The protesters suddenly broke through the police lines and rampaged through the Loop, smashing the windows of cars and stores. The police were prepared, and quickly isolated the rioters. Within 15 minutes, more than half the crowd had been arrested.

blameamerica1The Days of Rage cost Chicago and the state of Illinois approximately $183,000 ($100,000 for National Guard expenses, $35,000 in damages, and $20,000 for one injured citizen’s medical expenses). Most of the Weathermen and SDS leaders were now in jail, and the Weathermen would have to pay over $243,000 to pay for their bail.

In December 1969, the Chicago Police Department, in conjunction with the FBI, conducted a raid on the home of Black Panther Fred Hampton, in which he and Mark Clark were killed, with four of the seven other people in the apartment wounded. The survivors of the raid were all charged with assault and attempted murder. The police claimed they shot in self-defense, although a controversy arose when the Panthers and other activists presented what was alleged to be evidence suggesting that the sleeping Panthers were not resisting arrest. The charges were later dropped, and the families of the dead won a $1.8 million settlement from the government. It was discovered in 1971 that Hampton had been targeted by the FBI’s COINTELPRO.

We felt that the murder of Fred required us to be more grave, more serious, more determined to raise the stakes and not just be the white people who wrung their hands when black people were being murdered.—Bernadine Dohrn[2]

In 1970 the group issued a “Declaration of a State of War” against the Unitedimage002States government, using for the first time its new name, the “Weather Underground Organization” (WUO), adopting fake identities, and pursuing covert activities only. These initially included preparations for a bombing of a U.S. military non-commissioned officers’ dance at Fort Dix, New Jersey in what Brian Flanagan said had been intended to be “the most horrific hit the United States government had ever suffered on its territory”.

[edit] Investigated for San Francisco police station bombingBrian V. McDonnell, a sergeant with the San Franscisco Police Department who received fatal shrapnel wounds from a pipe bomb set off on February 16, 1970.

Brian V. McDonnell, a sergeant with the San Franscisco Police Department who received fatal shrapnel wounds from a pipe bomb set off on February 16, 1970.

The group was investigated for a bombing that took place on February 16, 1970, in which a pipe bomb filled with shrapnel detonated on the ledge of a window at the Park Station of the San Francisco Police Department. Brian V. McDonnell, a police sergeant, was fatally wounded in the explosion, and Robert Fogarty, another police officer, was severely wounded in his face and legs and was partially blinded. The Weathermen, along with the Black Panther Party were initially investigated for the murder, which was never solved. An investigation was reopened in 1999, and a San Francisco grand jury looked into the incident, but no indictments followed.

Initial New York City Bombings

On February 21, 1970, the Weathermen exploded three gasoline-filled firebombs at the home of New York State Supreme Court Justice Murtagh, who was presiding over the trial of the so-called “Panther 21,” members of the Black Panther Party over a plot to bomb New York landmarks and department stores. They painted graffiti on the sidewalk in front of his house: “FREE THE PANTHER 21; THE VIET CONG HAVE WON; KILL THE PIGS.” The same night, bombs were thrown at a police car in Manhattan and two military recruiting stations in Brooklyn.[citation needed] In late November, 1970, a letter to the Associated Press signed by Bernardine Dohrn promised more bombings.                 Greenwich Village explosion

Main article: Greenwich Village townhouse explosion

barackobamabus_flipflopexpress-oxy1On March 6, 1970, during preparations for the bombing of an officers’ dance at the Fort Dix U.S. Army base and for Butler Library at Columbia University,there was an explosion in a Greenwich Village safe house when the nail bomb being constructed prematurely detonated due to a wiring malfunction. WUO members Diana Oughton, Ted Gold, and Terry Robbins died in the explosion. Cathy Wilkerson and Kathy Boudin escaped unharmed, Boudin running naked from the apartment. It was an accident of history that the site of the Village explosion was the former residence of Merrill Lynch brokerage firm founder Charles Merrill and his son, the poet James Merrill. The younger Merrill subsequently recorded the event in his poem 18 West 11th Street, the title being the address of the house. An FBI report later stated that the group had possessed sufficient amounts of explosive to “level … both sides of the street”.

The bomb preparations have been pointed out by critics of the claim that the Weatherman group did not try to take lives with its bombings. Harvey Klehr, the Andrew W. Mellon professor of politics and history at Emory University in Atlanta, said in 2003, “The only reason they were not guilty of mass murder is mere incompetence. I don’t know what sort of defense that is.”

Underground

After the Greenwich Village incident, the group was now well underground, andfireburningbegan to refer to themselves as the Weather Underground Organization. At this juncture, WUO shrank considerably, becoming even fewer than they had been when first formed. The group was devastated by the loss of their friends, and in late April, 1970, members of the Weathermen met in California to discuss what had happened in New York and the future of the organization. The group decided to reevaluate their strategy, particularly in regard to their initial belief in the acceptability of human casualties, rejecting such tactics as kidnapping and assassinations.

They wanted to convince the American public that the United States was truly responsible for the calamity in Vietnam. The group began striking at night, bombing empty offices, with warnings always issued in advance to ensure a safe evacuation. According to David Gilbert, “[their] goal was to not hurt any people, and a lot of work went into that. But we wanted to pick targets that showed to the public who was responsible for what was really going on.” After the Greenwich Village explosion, no one was killed by WUO bombs.

We were very careful from the moment of the townhouse on to be sure we weren’t going to hurt anybody, and we never did hurt anybody. Whenever we put a bomb in a public space, we had figured out all kinds of ways to put checks and balances on the thing and also to get people away from it, and we were remarkably successful.—Bill Ayers

Investigators search for clues after the May 19, 1972 Weatherman bombing of the Pentagon Investigators search for clues after the May 19, 1972 Weatherman bombing of the Pentagon

On May 21, 1970, a communiqué from the Weather Underground was issued promising to attack a “symbol or institution of American injustice” within two weeks.The communiqué included taunts towards the FBI, daring them to try and find the group, whose members were spread throughout the United States. Many leftist organizations showed curiosity in the communiqué, and waited to see if the act would in fact occur. However, two weeks would pass without any occurrence. Then on June 9, 1970, their first publicly acknowledged bombing occurred at a New York City police station, saying it was “in outraged response to the assassination of the Soledad Brother George Jackson,” who had recently been killed by prison guards in an escape attempt. The FBI placed the Weather Underground organization on the ten most-wanted list by the end of 1970. On May 19, 1972, Ho Chi Minh’s birthday, The Weather Underground placed a bomb in the women’s bathroom in the Air Force wing of The Pentagon. The damage caused flooding that devastated classified information on computer tapes. Leftist groups worldwide applauded the bombing, illustrated by German youth protesting against American military systems in Frankfurt.                         Prairie Fire

flame21The Weather Underground’s ideology changed direction in the early 1970’s. With help from former Progressive Labor member, Clayton Van Lydegraf, The Weather Underground sought a more Marxist-Leninist approach. The leading members of the Weather Underground collaborated ideas and published their manifesto: “Prairie Fire: The Politics of Revolutionary Anti-Imperialism.” By the summer of 1974, five thousand copies had surfaced in coffee houses and bookstores across America. Leftist newspapers praised the manifesto.[33] Abbie Hoffman publicly praised Prairie Fire and believed every American should be given a copy. The manifesto’s influence initiated the formation of the ‘Prairie Fire Organizing Committee’ in several American cities. Hundreds of above-ground activists helped further the new political vision of the Weather Underground. In the late 1970s, the Weatherman group further split into two factions — the “May 19 Coalition” and the “Prairie Fire Collective” — with Bernadine Dohrn and Bill Ayers in the latter. The Prairie Fire Collective favored coming out of hiding, with members facing the criminal charges against them, while the May 19 Coalition continued in hiding. A decisive factor in Dohrn’s coming out of hiding were her concerns about her children. The Prairie Fire Collective started to surrender to the authorities from the late 1970s to the early 1980s. The remaining Weatherman Underground members continued to violently attack US institutions. Now I ask you,…does this sound like the kind of friendship even on a small level for even a short time you would encourage without AT LEAST REBUKING HIS ASSOCIATIONS FROM THE PAST? I wouldn’t be caught DEAD with so-called friends like these UNLESS I SUPPORTED THEIR BELIEFS 100%.00891

Let’s look at ANOTHER LIE for a moment…..Obama’s campaign website stated at the time:

Fact: Barack was never an ACORN trainer and never worked for ACORN in any other capacity.

Is that really a FACT, or just another lie? Let’s take a look at a quote from a 2004 article – Case Study: Chicago- The Barack Obama Campaign – written by Toni Foulkes, a Chicago ACORN Leader, which was published in the journal Social Policy. Did we mention that Social Policy recently pulled this particular article from their website, while leaving links to all other articles up?”Obama took the case, known as ACORN vs. Edgar (the name of the Republican governor at the time) and we won. Obama then went on to run a voter registration project with Project VOTE in 1992 that made it possible for Carol Moseley Braun to win the Senate that year. Project VOTE delivered 50,000 newly registered voters in that campaign (ACORN delivered about 5,000 of them).Since then, we have invited Obama to our leadership training sessions to run the session on power every year, and, as a result, many of our newly developing leaders got to know him before he ever ran for office. Thus it was natural for many of us to be active volunteers in his first campaign for STate Senate and then his failed bid for U.S. Congress in 1996. By the time he ran for U.S. Senate, we were old friends.”Not only does Foulkes boast of Obama’s ACORN leadership training, but also makes it clear that Obama’s post-law school organizing of “Project VOTE” in 1992 was undertaken in direct partnership with ACORN. The tie between Project VOTE and ACORN is also something that Obama and others have attempted to disprove in recent weeks as ACORN has come under fire for allegations of voter registration fraud.As recently as March 2008, the Los Angeles Times also made reference to Barack Obama’s involvement with ACORN:

“At the time, Talbot worked at the social action group ACORN and initially considered Obama a competitor. But she became so impressed with his work that she invited him to help train her staff.” (LA Times, March 2, 2008)

All this information was easily pulled up with minimal time investment. It took less than thirty minutes to find, despite attempts by some to bury the truth. If I could find this with little effort, imagine what could be dug up with a serious, in-depth investigation. Scary, isn’t it?

Nevertheless, Barack Obama’s campaign website continues to lie and deny the truth about his involvement and association with ACORN. No matter how many times you say it, it does not make it true. The facts do not lie, Senator Obama. It’s time to come clean and tell the truth, and it’s time for the American people to demand it.

obama-liarliar-105Of course the site has changed since this info was released…..The mere fact that his campaign has now changed the language of the site shows that they have conceded the fact that their original remark was a bold-face lie. As a lawyer Sen. Obama should know the importance of language.The original statement implied that he had no working connection with ACORN, whereas the new statement now insists that he has never been employed or hired by ACORN.It is good to see the truth finally come out now, but why were they trying to hide his association with ACORN if nothing is wrong with it? And what else is Obama lying to us about? Perhaps the biggest question now is how and why they got the Social Policy article stricken from most of the world wide web in the first.place. What are they trying to hide?

Crush the Obamedia narrative: Look who’s “gripped by insane rage”

By Michelle Malkin • October 12, 2008 11:50 AM

The Obamedia is attempting to set yet another false narrative: The narrative ofcaponethe McCain “mob.” McCain-Palin rallies are out of control, they wheedle. Conservatives are mad! They’re yelling mean things about Obama and calling him names! It’ scaaaaary! Go Here nowto read more about the TRULY INSANE LIBERALS that have nothing to do but OVERKILL the right of free speech! Liberals are real HATEMONGERS and that is a fact, I mean come on America IF the Obama camp can’t take real debate without this NASTY CRAP why is there any doubt he’s unfit to lead?

Here’s some real eye openers to read:

ABC Refuses to Run Right to Life Ad That Attacks Obama; Talk About Angry Thugs… Philly Leftists Boo Sarah Palin & Her 6 Year-Old Little Girl!; New Evidence Proves Former Kenyan Barack Obama Coached His Marxist Cousin Raila Odinga During ’07 Elections & Riots; Report: Troopergate Investigation Finds No Smoking Gun But Says Palin Abused Power… Plus- Palin Speaks on Non-Scandal (Video) ; Confirmed: Former Kenyan Is Running For US President ;Racist Anti-Semite Farrahkan Calls Obama the “Messiah” (Video); Yeah Right… Obama Said He Thought Ayers Had Been Rehabilitated ; Obama & Radical Fr. Pfleger Ran Chicago Protests Together ;McCain-Palin Camp Releases Devastating New Ad “Ayers” ; Obama’s Ties to Pro-Palestinian Leaders & US Terrorists Revealed ; Good News For Obama… 105% of Indianapolis Voters Are Registered to Vote! ; Barack Obama’s Solution to the Energy Crisis: We Must “Reduce” Our Energy Consumption (Video) ; Barack Obama: “That’s Just How White Folks Will Do You… White People Have Demons” (Video) …Update: Obama Wrote– Attack on Whites Was Justified!; 20,000 Greet Sarah Palin in Florida– Liberals Upset She Said “God” While On Stage ; Busted!… Pro-Obama PAC Caught Producing Bogus Video Claiming Support For Obama From Israeli Leaders ; Say It Aint So, Joe!… Global Temps Are Cooling Not Heating Up ; Obama Admitted His Work With Terrorist Bill Ayers Qualified Him For US Senator (Video) ; Outrageous!… California Nurses Union Airs “Dead McCain” Ad! …Update: Sick Ad Distorts the Facts! ; Joe Biden Supported Funding the Troops Before He –joined Obama and– Didn’t Support the Troops (Video) ;New McCain Ad: Lib Senator Biden Caught In Several Lies ; Here’s This Year’s List of Reasons to Vote Democrat.….NOT!!! ; Ohio Dem Secretary of State Bans Observers From Same Day Registration & Voting!! ; Dem Deceit Hits New Low– “Pro-Life Obama” Website Created Think they used a back-ho for this low!

biden_footSince you brought it up, here’s a History Lesson for you Lib’s about the Anti-war NUTS in the 2nd World war who were so WRONG….sound familiar?

America First:the Anti-War Movement, Charles Lindbergh

and the Second World War, 1940-1941

What about Obama’s outright Lies that he STILL has not admitted too?

Here are some great reading blogs from another page I thought said it all so I wouldn’t have too: http://conservablogs.com/velvethammer/2008/05/26/obamas-lies/

Lie after lie, after lie, after blatant lie. Piling up like dirtyan-crossing_fingers_md_blkObama’s DOCUMENTED LIES: 50 and remarkably they will continue to heap to the heavens…..like this is new to a Liberal in Washington! laundry.

– Obama WTF50 Obama claimed he had never prayed in a Mosque; his campaign had to retract that statement49 Obama dishonestly used third party comments in his ads to pump up his healthcare plan

48 Claims he never discussed politics with Pastor; rebutted by photo of Obama with team of lobbyists led by Wright

47 Obama, an expert at parsing words, claimed he wasn’t familiar with the word “Clintonian”; then changed his story

46 Despite reeking of cigarettes, Obama denied smoking to ABC; now admits smoking on MSNBC

45 Obama said he’d meet unconditionally with Leader of Iran: now claims he “didn’t have Ahmadinejad in mind”

44 Obama claims he is using public financing to avoid special interests: WSJ nails his switcheroo

43 Obama’s rhetoric claims more young black men in jail than college: BoJ Stats disprove

42Claims he never said he was a proponent of single-payer universal healthcare; Video proves he did

41 Obama claims remarks to industrialists were greeted with silence, shows he can deliver tough message: video of ovation

40 Obamas claim you dont rip opponents & leave on roadside:he did it to Alice Palmer

39 Obama denies saying Indiana could be tie-breaker: he did

38 Obama omits that Pastor Wright led divestiture campaign from Israel

37 Obama claims Church not controversial; he lied since 86

36 Lied about intention of taking US out of NAFTA

35 Obamas claim poverty growing up: both distort reality

34 Obama denies meeting Saddam’s Auchi; sworn Fed. witness places Obama at undisclosed party for Auchi at Rezkos

33 Obama lies about not attacking Clinton over her Bosnia lies

32 Obama claims he passed ethics reform; ABC News shows he lied

31 Obama says he’s consistently opposed NAFTA; in October 2007 he supported expansion to Peru

30 Obama claims he’s above dirty political tricks; Clinton proves he lies

29 Obama claims his “bitter” remarks were mangled; then repeats attacks on guns religion and angry people

28 Obama stated he’d stopped wearing flag pin on chest; now denies saying it, but video proves he is lying

27 Obama says he did no favors for Rezko;untrue; he lobbied for him

26 Changes story repeatedly re Rezko’s help in buying mansion

25 Obama claims he never supported a ban on handguns; he has twice

24 Obama claims stays at UCC as Pastor acknowledged comments were inappropriate; Wright never made this statement

23 Campaign is beholden to “only the people” as unlike McCain/Clinton he does not take lobbyist /PAC money; LIES!

22 Claims campaign never called Canada to say Obama not truthful re wanting leave NAFTA; smoking gun memo proves lied

21 Mrs Obama admits she’s never been proud of America; Video disproves Sen. Obama’s later claim she was misquoted

20 Claimed would not run for President

19 Claims famous in Il. for not letting lobbyists even buy him lunch; took from teachers, trial lawyers, hospital admins

18 Claims his parents met at Selma civil rights march; Washington Post noted it occurred 4 yrs after Obama’s birth

17 BO claims courageously opposed war in 2002 during US Senate campaign; He did not announce his senate bid until 2003

16 Claims he passes tough Nuclear Law; NYT uncovers he took Nuclear Industry pay-off and watered down the bill

15 Claimed he didn’t know Rezko was corrupt when did a real estate deal with him; Chicago papers prove he lied

14 Claims does not accept money from Big Oil: Real Clear Politics proves he lied

13 Denies using his Hopefund PAC to influence endorsers; but the Washington Post reviewed the record and disagreed

12 Claims his State Chair is not a drug company lobbyist; Time magazine cries Bull****

11Lies about how much he received in campaign funds from Rezko; forced to significantly increase the amount twice

10 Claims he did not fill out the 1996 candidate questionaire; Politico proves he lied

9 Took credit for achievement of others in Chicago; resume puffing exposed by LA Times

8 Claims he kept no State Senate records; now he changes his story

7 Denies doubling wife’s salary was due to becoming US Senator; omits within months he earmarked $1 million for hospital

6 Denied meeting Saddam bagman Auchi; now admits he was at his dinner but does not remember talking to him

5 Denies using his church for politics: IRS disagree

4 Claims he was unaware of Pastor Wrights 911 comments: NYT proves he lied

3 Claims his father was a goat-herd; actually he was a man of privilige

2 Claims not an active muslim as child; Indonesian paper proves he lied

1 Claims father linked to Kennedys; Washington Post proves he lied

H/T Pamela via LarwynUpdates:

51. Obama spoke about his uncle, who was part of the American brigade that helped to liberate Auschwitz; Impossible. Auschwitz of course is in Poland. It was liberated by the Red Army on Jan 27 1945

Related Ironic Surrealism II posts:Obama’s Friends in Low Places

Obama: Identity Politics

Is Obama a Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing?

Obama All Over the Map

Connecting the Dots: The Barack Obama Bill Ayers Connection

TUCC “Schmoozing with Terrorists”

Dhimmi Carter & His Kinfolk Cotton to Obama

The Road to Hell is Paved With Obama’s Intentions

Latest Obama attack ad: Barack Obama show us YOUR flag

Lemmings for Obama!

Obama on Meet the Press May 4 2008

Chicago: “Urban Terrorism” On Obama’s Watch

Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!

Snoballistic Obama

Smelling Salts

Obama’s Cult of Personality

Obama’s ‘Original’ Race Speech

Obama’s ‘Race’ Speech in Full!

Human ‘Race’ Anyone?

Michael Pfleger & Jeremiah Wright – Men of the Cloth? No. Cut From the Same Cloth? Yes!

Obama Roundup

Scrub-a-dub-dub

Criticism Over SNL’s Fauxbama Beyond All Reason

“¡Viva La Revolucion De Obama!”

Obama Plays the Cancer Card

Obama’s Family Tree

October 20, 2008 7:35 AM

ABC News’ Matthew Jaffe Reports: Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., on Sunday guaranteed that if elected, Sen. Barack Obama., D-Ill., will be tested by an international crisis within his first six months in power and he will need supporters to stand by him as he makes tough, and possibly unpopular, decisions.”Mark my words,” the Democratic vice presidential nominee warned at the second of his two Seattle fundraisers Sunday. “It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking. We’re about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember I said it standing here if you don’t remember anything else I said. Watch, we’re gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy.””I can give you at least four or five scenarios from where it might originate,” Biden said to Emerald City supporters, mentioning the Middle East and Russia as possibilities. “And he’s gonna need help. And the kind of help he’s gonna need is, he’s gonna need you – not financially to help him – we’re gonna need you to use your influence, your influence within the community, to stand with him. Because it’s not gonna be apparent initially, it’s not gonna be apparent that we’re right.”Not only will the next administration have to deal with foreign affairs issues, Biden warned, but also with the current economic crisis.

“Gird your loins,” Biden told the crowd. “We’re gonna win with your help, God willing, we’re gonna win, but this is not gonna be an easy ride. This president, the next president, is gonna be left with the most significant task. It’s like cleaning the Augean stables, man. This is more than just a capital crisis, this is more than just markets. This is a systemic problem we have with this economy.”

“There are gonna be a lot of you (A lot more than he knows because the “I told you so’s” will be flowing like water) who want to go, ‘Whoa, wait a minute, yo, whoa, whoa, I don’t know about that decision’,” Biden continued. “Because if you think the decision is sound when they’re made, which I believe you will when they’re made, they’re not likely to be as popular as they are sound. Because if they’re popular, they’re probably not sound.”

Biden emphasized that the mountainous Afghanistan-Pakistan border is of particular concern, with Osama bin Laden “alive and well” [Note here that NOT even the C.I.A. knows if he’s alive OR well] and Pakistan “bristling with nuclear weapons.”

Now this is the most telling thing ever said as he FINALLY noticed After speaking for just over a quarter of an hour, the media presence in the back of the small ballroom.”I probably shouldn’t have said all this because it dawned on me that the press is here,” he joked. (I don’t believe for a moment that this was a joke in any way, he really did not want to say this to the press….but I’m glad he did! This is the greatest truth that has ever escaped the lips of Biden to date because it reveals a fact “missed on purpose” by the Obama LOVE-FEST Media…..That he is NOT READY TO LEAD let alone follow others advice about our great country. Don’t get me wrong I would be the first in line to vote for a “Black man or Women” IF they had valuable experience and useful WISDOM from years of dealing with trouble instead of avoiding it and posing for the camera. I wish that Bill Cosby were running at least he won’t stand for the crap Obama has allowed to surround him. Color has no barring on why Obama is NOT the Man he thinks he is! )

Think about this very carefully people….John McCain did have just that kind of experience and that’s a fact, TWO YEARS in the Senate and a Few long-winded speeches does not a Leader make, but many years making decisions that in many cases were unpopular at the time and sticking to your guns does. McCain is a man of integrity and bold purpose and won’t back down when strength is required.

This election is NOT and never should have been framed by the idiot media as “Black against White” but instead as a battle between the Truth of McCains readiness vs. the covered up facts about Obamas lack of experience. What does skin color have to do with experience? What does Obamas ability to give forceful speeches have to do with dealing with Islamic Terrorists who hate everything America stands for including race relations or talking without conditions? This election is cut and dry, without great experience there will be NO good result for America but ONLY more of the same Liberal do nothing agenda. What have THEY accomplished in the Past 4 years since they became THE MAJORITY RULE? And what makes ANYONE think that there will be “Change to believe in” the next 4 years, if Liberals rule again?

Why you should care about A.C.O.R.N…..This IS NOT GOING AWAY LIBERALS so deal with it now or get arrested with them later, your choice!

Beyond the speeches, how much do you really know about Barack Obama? Learn about his connection to William Ayers.

George Stephanopolis questions Obama about Ayers. Very weak response from Obama!

ABC News Democratic debate from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania – Barack Obama questioned about Jeremiah Wright. April 16, 2008 FUNNY HOW THEY ARE NOW FRIENDLY after this debate? After all Hilary said the same things that we are saying now BUT we somehow have it wrong while she remains untouched by the media machine….how come?

ELECTION 2008 [A real Bummer for America]

Farrakhan on Obama: ‘The Messiah is absolutely speaking’ or is it Anti-Christ spirit speaking?


Posted: October 09, 20088:03 pm Eastern

© 2008 WorldNetDaily

Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, another powerful Chicago-based political figure associated with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and other long-time associates of Democratic Party presidential candidate Barack Obama, is leaving no doubt about what he thinks of the leader in the campaign for the White House.

He says when Obama talks “the Messiah is absolutely speaking.”

You can watch it for yourself on a newly posted YouTube video.This is shocking IF your not deceived already!

Addressing a large crowd behind a podium Feb. 24 with a Nation of Islam Saviour’s Day 2008 sign, Farrakhan proclaims, “You are the instruments that God is going to use to bring about universal change, and that is why Barack has captured the youth. And he has involved young people in a political process that they didn’t care anything about. That’s a sign. When the Messiah speaks, the youth will hear, and the Messiah is absolutely speaking.”

WND ELECTION 2008Farrakhan on Obama: ‘The Messiah is absolutely speaking’

‘Barack has captured the youth,’ will bring about ‘universal change’

Posted: October 09, 2008

8:03 pm Eastern

© 2008 WorldNetDaily

Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, another powerful Chicago-based political figure associated with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and other long-time associates of Democratic Party presidential candidate Barack Obama, is leaving no doubt about what he thinks of the leader in the campaign for the White House.

He says when Obama talks “the Messiah is absolutely speaking.”

You can watch it for yourself on a newly posted YouTube video.

Addressing a large crowd behind a podium Feb. 24 with a Nation of Islam Saviour’s Day 2008 sign, Farrakhan proclaims,

“You are the instruments that God is going to use to bring about universal change, and that is why Barack has captured the youth. And he has involved young people in a political process that they didn’t care anything about. That’s a sign. When the Messiah speaks, the youth will hear, and the Messiah is absolutely speaking.”

“Brothers and sisters,” Farrakhan said, “Barack Obama to me, is a herald of the Messiah. Barack Obama is like the trumpet that alerts you something new, something better is on the way.”

Farrakhan points out that the man Nation of Islam followers refer to as “the Savior,” Fard Muhammad, had a black father and a white mother, just as Obama did.

“A black man with a white mother became a savior to us,” he said. “A black man with a white mother could turn out to be one who can lift America from her fall.

“Would God allow Barack to be president of a country that has been so racist, so evil in its treatment of Hispanics, native Americans, blacks?” he asked. “Would God do something like that? Yeah. Of course he would. That’s to show you that the stone that the builders rejected has become the headstone of the corner. This is a sign to you. It’s the time of our rise. It’s the time that we should take our place. The future is all about you.”

Get “The Audacity of Deceit: Barack Obama’s War on American Values”

Farrakhan suggested he would keep a low profile in the campaign, despite his enthusiasm for Obama.

“That’s why you have never heard me make any comment,” he explained. “I love that brother, and I want to see that brother successful. I don’t want to say anything that would hurt that brother, and I don’t want them to use me or the Nation of Islam.” WOW his ego is only surpassed by his lack of knowing he just did drop a bomb on Obama with this saying!

Returning to the theme that Obama is a mystical figure, Farrakhan said, he “is not the Messiah for sure, but anytime he gives you a sign of uniting races, ethnic groups, ideologies, religions and makes people feel a sense of oneness, that’s not necessarily Satan’s work, that is, I believe, the work of God.”

He went on to point out that when religious scholars talk about Christ or the Islamic Mahdi, they never talk in racial terms – again, pointing to Obama’s mixed racial background.

WND previously reported a website called “Is Barack Obama the Messiah?” captured the wave of euphoria that followed the Democratic senator’s remarkable rise.

The site is topped by an Obama quote strategically ripped from a Jan. 7 speech at Dartmouth College just before the New Hampshire Primary in which he told students, “… a light will shine through that window, a beam of light will come down upon you, you will experience an epiphany, and you will suddenly realize that you must go to the polls and vote” for Obama.

MSNBC anchor Chris Matthews is among the many members of the media enraptured by Obama, admitting he felt a “thrill going up my leg” listening to an Obama speech. Careful that could be a serious medical condition called “B.S Insideous” better known as “Political blindness of the thought process.”

Columnist Mark Morford of the San Francisco Chronicle writes that Obama has a charisma that goes beyond “his youthful vigor, or handsomeness, or even inspiring rhetoric.”

“Bill Clinton, with all his effortless, winking charm, didn’t have what Obama has, which is a sort of powerful luminosity, a unique high-vibration integrity,” Gladnick says. “Dismiss it all you like, but I’ve heard from far too many enormously smart, wise, spiritually attuned people who’ve been intuitively blown away by Obama’s presence – not speeches, not policies, but sheer presence – to say it’s just a clever marketing ploy, a slick gambit carefully orchestrated by hotshot campaign organizers who, once Obama gets into office, will suddenly turn from perky optimists to vile soul-sucking lobbyist whores, with Obama as their suddenly evil, cackling overlord.” Does this mean that Bill and Hilary will have to settle for “Crying in the Wilderness” instead of “ascending on High”?

Talk radio host Rush Limbaugh criticized Democrats who were comparing Obama to Jesus and Gov. Sarah Palin to Pontius Pilate.

“I know Jesus Christ. I pray to Jesus Christ all the time,” said Limbaugh.” I study what Jesus Christ did and said all the time, and let me tell you something, Barack Obama, you are no Jesus Christ.”

He also attacked Obama’s stances for abortion and sex education for children in kindergarten, saying, “I can’t find any such references to Jesus promoting infanticide nor do I find any references to Jesus Christ suggesting sex education be taught to 4- and 5-year-olds, but I’m still looking in the New Testament and I’ll let you all know if I come up with anything.”

Democrats, including party strategist Donna Brazile and Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., made nearly identical biblical comparisons of the characters in this presidential election, which Limbaugh traced back to a Sept. 4 posting on a Washington blog.

“Barack Obama was a community organizer like Jesus,” Cohen said during a one-minute speech on the floor of the U.S. House yesterday. “Pontius Pilate was a governor.”

I am very concerned about all of the deception happening in the USA and the world as we are in the Last Days and cannot afford to remain asleep at the wheel concerning Obama and his False Prophets. America is at stake for real in this election and the facts are clear cut no matter what “The Liberal Love Fest” states about Obama he’s phony to the core!

Please read:

http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=77508

Please watch THIS TELLING VIDEO WHICH SHOWS JUST HOW SMART OBAMAS FOLLOWERS WERE BEFORE VOTING EVEN STARTED: http://www.angelfire.com/ak2/intelligencerreport/clueless.html

Published on NewsBusters.org (http://newsbusters.org)

CNN’s Drew Griffin Warps Quote From National Review in Palin Interview

By Matthew Balan

Created 2008-10-22 13:22

During an interview with Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin on Tuesday’s Situation Room, CNN’s Drew Griffin ripped a phrase out of a recent article by National Review’s Byron York which criticized the media’s coverage of Palin and characterized it as an attack on the Alaska governor. Griffin pointed out how “[t]he press has been pretty hard on you. The Democrats have been pretty hard on you, but also some conservatives have been pretty hard on you as well. The National Review had a story saying that, you know, ‘I can’t tell if Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt, or all of the above.’” In the original article, which was originally only in the print version of National Review [1], York used the “incompetent” phrase to attack the media: “Watching press coverage of the Republican candidate for vice president, it’s sometimes hard to decide whether Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt, backward or – well, all of the above.”

Palin responded to the question by first lightly asking where the quote came from. Griffin didn’t have York’s name handy to answer her inquiry. She then used the McCain campaign’s standard depictions of the ticket, that McCain is a “patriot and the maverick in the Senate” and how she is the “team member who is new and fresh, with new ideas, new vision, new energy that needs to be infused into Washington, D.C., with that commitment to clean it up in DC, put government on the side of the people, and fight hard for Americans.” She then continued by addressing the mangled quote from National Review: “…I think that some in the media, maybe in the National Review — they don’t know what to make of that. They are like, geez, she’s — you know, where did she come from? Surely, you know, it should be our job, I think they assume, is to pick and be negative and find things to mock, and that’s just, I guess, part of the political game, I guess.”

This isn’t the first time that CNN has highlighted supposed conservative rancor towards Palin. Less than a week earlier, during an interview with National Review’s Ramesh Ponnuru, CNN anchor Rick Sanchez tried to portray that there were a bunch of conservatives who were “defecting,” [1] in his words, from John McCain over his selection of Palin as his running mate. Prior to the airing of the Palin interview, CNN even aired a promo during The Situation Room which featured Griffin’s warping of the York quote and Palin’s immediate reaction to it [see video above; audio available here [1]].

The transcript of the relevant portion of the Palin interview, which began five minutes into the 6 pm Eastern hour of Tuesday’s Situation Room:

DREW GRIFFIN: Governor, you have been mocked in the press. The press has been pretty hard on you. The Democrats have been pretty hard on you, but also some conservatives have been pretty hard on you as well. The National Review had a story saying that, you know, ‘I can’t tell if Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt, or all of the above.’
PALIN: Who wrote that one?
GRIFFIN: That — that was in the National Review. I don’t have the author.
PALIN: Who wrote it? I would like to talk to that person.
GRIFFIN: But they were talking about the fact that your experience as governor is not getting out. Do you feel trapped in this campaign, that your message is not getting out, and, if so, who do you blame?
PALIN: No, I am getting my message right now out, through you and with you, Drew, to the American people who are watching CNN, and I appreciate this opportunity. No, you know that I am, obviously, an outsider of the Washington elite and of the conventional, I think, media targets or media characters that have been a part of this for years, and I think that is final — that it’s good for the American electorate to understand, they have a choice here in our ticket of having the experience and the reputation that comes with John McCain as being the patriot and the maverick in the Senate — you have that and you combine it with a team member who is new and fresh, with new ideas, new vision, new energy that needs to be infused into Washington, D.C., with that commitment to clean it up in DC, put government on the side of the people, and fight hard for Americans. You have that, that combination, and I think that some in the media, maybe in the National Review — they don’t know what to make of that. They are like, geez, she’s — you know, where did she come from? Surely, you know, it should be our job, I think they assume, is to pick and be negative and find things to mock, and that’s just, I guess, part of the political game, I guess. But we are very, very committed and focused and moving forward between now and November 4th — getting that message out to the American people, that our plan to get this economy back on the right track and to win the wars, put government on the side of the people — it’s the right thing to do, and I think we have the right message, despite the mocking that comes our way.

It would be funny if it were not pitiful to watch the “Love Fest” the media has with “The One” Obama team and the over zealous way they state as fact their “misquote” of the real conversation. BUT if anyone who does not agree catches that misquote they ATTACK the integrity and family line of that opposition and IN THE SAME BREATH denounce unfair stating of the facts from us…..sorry if the facts don’t support the lies but that’s real life, Mr. and Miss Liberal. Come on Americans wake up….the Spin and lies from politics is stinking up the T.V. Screens daily and NOT ONE LIBERAL MEDIA OUTLET SAYS A WORD AGAINST IT UNLESS THEIR SAYING ITS McCain or Palin…the great right wing conspiracy twosome! This is nuts, and America will suffer because we don’t care enough to question the “status quo” of which the media ARE the BIGGEST AFFENDERS and make them tell THE WHOLE TRUTH and not just cut it up and paste it together TO SUPPORT THEIR SMALL MINDED IDEAS of how America should look.

CyberAlert: Exposing Media Bias DailyBy Nearly 8-to-1, Voters Say Journalists Want Obama to Win

“Voters overwhelmingly believe that the media wants Barack Obama to win the presidential election,” a Pew Research Center for the People and the Press survey has discovered. Specifically: “By a margin of 70%-9%, Americans say most journalists want to see Obama, not John McCain, win on Nov. 4.” Unsurprisingly, 90 percent of Republicans recognized how journalists hope Obama is victorious, yet so did 62 percent of Democrats and independents.

By Nearly 8-to-1, Voters Say Journalists Want Obama to Win

Williams Pushes McCain-Palin on Ayers, Avoid Wright, Define Elite

Imperial Williams Huffs: Had to Wait ’55 Days’ to Talk to Palin!

CBS’s Smith Compares Obama to Lincoln; Obama Attacks Hannity

Time’s Klein Adores Obama’s Calm, Asks Nothing that Would Ruin It

ABC’s Nightline Gleefully Investigates ‘the Palin Problem’

McFadden to Clinton: Comparisons to Palin Must ‘Rankle You’

CNN’s Griffin Acknowledges ‘Botched’ National Review Quotation


CBS Scolds McCain’s Tactics, Sees Hypocrisy in Palin’s WardrobeABC’s David Wright Slams Palin for Living in a ‘Glass House’

Williams Hits McCain with Powell’s Contention Palin’s Unqualified

In Palin Interview, CNN’s Griffin Warps National Review Quote

Tom Brokaw Takes Barack Obama Over Rush Limbaugh on Credibility

Joy Behar on ABC’s The View: ‘Rush Limbaugh is a Terrorist’

Press Release: Oct. 24: CNN’S National Review Blunder: Case Closed

Press Release: Oct. 22: Pro-Obama Media Bias So Bad, Even Dan Rather Can See It

Media Reality Check As Campaign Cops, Media Tilt Against GOP At the last debate, a pleased Barack Obama touted a CBS poll showing many voters think John McCain has run a more negative campaign. But a new Media Research Center study finds that one reason for that may be that the big broadcast networks have condemned McCain’s ads as too negative or “false” nearly three times more than Obama’s.Previous: Bob Schieffer Tilted Left Against Bush in 2004

Worst of the WeekABC’s Moran Implies GOP Endangers Obama’s Life

Before Barack Obama began running for president, ABC’s Terry Moran was showering the “political phenomenon” with fawning press. Now, in the final weeks of the campaign, Moran suggested to vice presidential candidate Joe Biden that Republican criticism of Obama could threaten “Senator Obama’s safety.” But Moran did not confront Biden with nasty language from Democrats equating John McCain with the ’60s racist Democratic Governor George Wallace.Previous: Media Rage at “Nasty,” “Ugly,” & “Bitter” McCain Campaign

Notable QuotablesEvil GOP Is Endangering Obama

Reporters howl that John McCain’s campaign is “disgraceful,” “ugly” and “chumming the waters” with “a full-bore attack on [Barack] Obama’s character,” even as some journalists suggest that the campaign rhetoric is putting Obama in physical jeopardy. “Are you at all concerned in this home stretch for Senator Obama’s safety,” ABC’s Terry Moran worried to Joe Biden. “There are concerns about actually inciting violence,” NBC’s Ron Allen similarly fretted to Hillary Clinton. Meanwhile, the Associated Press declares that Sarah Palin is flirting with racism for saying Obama is “palling around” with terrorist William Ayers (Ayers is white), and a college student tells MSNBC’s Chris Matthews that she’s looking for “a display of knowledge and expertise.” Matthews shot back: “So you’re on the Obama side, right?”

Sweet-On-Obama Sixteen Media Bias TournamentThe liberal media have journalisticaly disenfranchised you with their nauseating pro-Obama reporting. Now you have a way to strike back, at the MRC ballot box.

Special ReportObama’s Margin of Victory: The Media

The Democratic contest between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton was the closest nomination in a generation. But Obama had a crucial advantage over his rivals this year: the support of the national media, especially the three broadcast networks. A new study by the Media Research Center documents how at every step of his national political career, network reporters showered the Illinois Senator with glowing media coverage, building him up as a political celebrity and exhibiting little interest in investigating his past associations or exploring the controversies that could have threatened his campaign.Special ReportEditing Reverend Wright’s Wrongs

Obama’s greatest struggle in the primaries was the controversy over his long-time minister Jeremiah Wright and his noxious recorded sermons suggesting America deserved 9/11 and AIDS was a U.S. government conspiracy. But ABC, CBS, and NBC’s coverage protected the candidate by showing little of Wright’s radical rhetoric and allowing liberal guests to dominate the discussion.

Public Sees Media’s Pro-Obama/Anti-McCain and Palin Tilt. Several surveys have confirmed the public recognizes the news media’s liberal bias this campaign season — while the media’s credibility has plummeted to new lows.

Plus:Rasmussen: 63%+ of ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC and MSNBC Viewers Back Obama

More Polls on How the Public Views the News Media

Polls Documenting Liberal Beliefs of Journalists

Previous: Naming Party of Democrats in Scandals Avoided, But Not with Republicans

Media Bias cannot be denied unless you are the Biased ones…that is so let’s look at this from the standpoint of the learned.

Media Bias Is Real, Finds UCLA Political ScientistBy

Meg Sullivan

| 12/14/2005 5:36:31 PM

While the editorial page of The Wall Street Journal is conservative, the newspaper’s news pages are liberal, even more liberal than The New York Times. The Drudge Report may have a right-wing reputation, but it leans left. Coverage by public television and radio is conservative compared to the rest of the mainstream media. Meanwhile, almost all major media outlets tilt to the left.These are just a few of the surprising findings from a UCLA-led study, which is believed to be the first successful attempt at objectively quantifying bias in a range of media outlets and ranking them accordingly.”I suspected that many media outlets would tilt to the left because surveys have shown that reporters tend to vote more Democrat than Republican,” said Tim Groseclose, a UCLA political scientist and the study’s lead author. “But I was surprised at just how pronounced the distinctions are.”

“Overall, the major media outlets are quite moderate compared to members of Congress, but even so, there is a quantifiable and significant bias in that nearly all of them lean to the left,” said co‑author Jeffrey Milyo, University of Missouri economist and public policy scholar.

The results appear in the latest issue of the Quarterly Journal of Economics, which will become available in mid-December.

Groseclose and Milyo based their research on a standard gauge of a lawmaker’s support for liberal causes. Americans for Democratic Action (ADA) tracks the percentage of times that each lawmaker votes on the liberal side of an issue. Based on these votes, the ADA assigns a numerical score to each lawmaker, where “100” is the most liberal and “0” is the most conservative. After adjustments to compensate for disproportionate representation that the Senate gives to low‑population states and the lack of representation for the District of Columbia, the average ADA score in Congress (50.1) was assumed to represent the political position of the average U.S. voter.

Groseclose and Milyo then directed 21 research assistants — most of them college students — to scour U.S. media coverage of the past 10 years. They tallied the number of times each media outlet referred to think tanks and policy groups, such as the left-leaning NAACP or the right-leaning Heritage Foundation.

Next, they did the same exercise with speeches of U.S. lawmakers. If a media outlet displayed a citation pattern similar to that of a lawmaker, then Groseclose and Milyo’s method assigned both a similar ADA score.

“A media person would have never done this study,” said Groseclose, a UCLA political science professor, whose research and teaching focuses on the U.S. Congress. “It takes a Congress scholar even to think of using ADA scores as a measure. And I don’t think many media scholars would have considered comparing news stories to congressional speeches.”

Of the 20 major media outlets studied, 18 scored left of center, with CBS’ “Evening News,” The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times ranking second, third and fourth most liberal behind the news pages of The Wall Street Journal.

Only Fox News’ “Special Report With Brit Hume” and The Washington Times scored right of the average U.S. voter.

The most centrist outlet proved to be the “NewsHour With Jim Lehrer.” CNN’s “NewsNight With Aaron Brown” and ABC’s “Good Morning America” were a close second and third.

“Our estimates for these outlets, we feel, give particular credibility to our efforts, as three of the four moderators for the 2004 presidential and vice-presidential debates came from these three news outlets — Jim Lehrer, Charlie Gibson and Gwen Ifill,” Groseclose said. “If these newscasters weren’t centrist, staffers for one of the campaign teams would have objected and insisted on other moderators.”

The fourth most centrist outlet was “Special Report With Brit Hume” on Fox News, which often is cited by liberals as an egregious example of a right-wing outlet. While this news program proved to be right of center, the study found ABC’s “World News Tonight” and NBC’s “Nightly News” to be left of center. All three outlets were approximately equidistant from the center, the report found.

“If viewers spent an equal amount of time watching Fox’s ‘Special Report’ as ABC’s ‘World News’ and NBC’s ‘Nightly News,’ then they would receive a nearly perfectly balanced version of the news,” said Milyo, an associate professor of economics and public affairs at the University of Missouri at Columbia.

Five news outlets — “NewsHour With Jim Lehrer,” ABC’s “Good Morning America,” CNN’s “NewsNight With Aaron Brown,” Fox News’ “Special Report With Brit Hume” and the Drudge Report — were in a statistical dead heat in the race for the most centrist news outlet. Of the print media, USA Today was the most centrist.

An additional feature of the study shows how each outlet compares in political orientation with actual lawmakers. The news pages of The Wall Street Journal scored a little to the left of the average American Democrat, as determined by the average ADA score of all Democrats in Congress (85 versus 84). With scores in the mid-70s, CBS’ “Evening News” and The New York Times looked similar to Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., who has an ADA score of 74.

Most of the outlets were less liberal than Lieberman but more liberal than former Sen. John Breaux, D-La. Those media outlets included the Drudge Report, ABC’s “World News Tonight,” NBC’s “Nightly News,” USA Today, NBC’s “Today Show,” Time magazine, U.S. News & World Report, Newsweek, NPR’s “Morning Edition,” CBS’ “Early Show” and The Washington Post.

Since Groseclose and Milyo were more concerned with bias in news reporting than opinion pieces, which are designed to stake a political position, they omitted editorials and Op‑Eds from their tallies. This is one reason their study finds The Wall Street Journal more liberal than conventional wisdom asserts.

Another finding that contradicted conventional wisdom was that the Drudge Report was slightly left of center.

“One thing people should keep in mind is that our data for the Drudge Report was based almost entirely on the articles that the Drudge Report lists on other Web sites,” said Groseclose. “Very little was based on the stories that Matt Drudge himself wrote. The fact that the Drudge Report appears left of center is merely a reflection of the overall bias of the media.”

Yet another finding that contradicted conventional wisdom relates to National Public Radio, often cited by conservatives as an egregious example of a liberal news outlet. But according to the UCLA-University of Missouri study, it ranked eighth most liberal of the 20 that the study examined.

“By our estimate, NPR hardly differs from the average mainstream news outlet,” Groseclose said. “Its score is approximately equal to those of Time, Newsweek and U.S. News & World Report and its score is slightly more conservative than The Washington Post’s. If anything, government‑funded outlets in our sample have a slightly lower average ADA score (61), than the private outlets in our sample (62.8).”

The researchers took numerous steps to safeguard against bias — or the appearance of same — in the work, which took close to three years to complete. They went to great lengths to ensure that as many research assistants supported Democratic candidate Al Gore in the 2000 election as supported President George Bush. They also sought no outside funding, a rarity in scholarly research.

“No matter the results, we feared our findings would’ve been suspect if we’d received support from any group that could be perceived as right- or left-leaning, so we consciously decided to fund this project only with our own salaries and research funds that our own universities provided,” Groseclose said.

The results break new ground.

“Past researchers have been able to say whether an outlet is conservative or liberal, but no one has ever compared media outlets to lawmakers,” Groseclose said. “Our work gives a precise characterization of the bias and relates it to known commodity — politicians.”

I am truly -Amazed by the outright IGNORANCE of believers and unbelievers ALIKE. Most people have made the MISTAKE of PRE-VOTING for this man without a clue as to what they have done….wasting their right to a free country, a God given right to choose who will lead us into the next 4 years.

I do not say this because of my choice but because of the plain as day LIES before their eyes which most have closed their eyes too (Please read my previous posts). This election was between a Man who is not IN THE LEAST BIT QUALIFIED TO LEAD THIS COUNTRY TO A NEW DAWN (At least Bill Clinton had experience running government), he will fail as all socialists BEFORE HIM have because socialism DOES JUST NOT WORK and never will. He can only succeed IF HE DOES NOT LISTEN TO THE LIB’S AND RULE FROM A CENTRIST POSITION.

” CAPITALISM has Failed ” Obama’s SOCIALIST TIRADE RANT

Barack Obama’s Socialist Party Membership Uncovered

BHO Admits He’s a Socialist

Vote Against Socialist Change

The Union of Obama Socialist Republics

The Obama Chronicle – Obama’s Wealth Redistribution Plan

PrestoPunditObama’s leftist dreams, the housing bubble, Sarah Palin for VP, Schwarzenegger’s jump into politics, the artificial boom and inevitable crackup. PrestoPundit readers learned about it here first, months — sometimes years — before the MSM knew what hit them.

BARACK OBAMA HID HIS FATHER\’S SOCIALIST AND ANTI-WESTERN CONVICTIONS FROM HIS READERS

Explorations blog Liberal Smear merchants are Losers again! Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.

Palin Rumors debunked and put to rest!

Sarah Palin Smear Watch: False Internet Claims and Rumors Debunked AGAIN

“The One” Barack Obama was much less than upfront for good reason in his half-hour INFOMERCIAL praising himself as our messiah in the wings to deliver us from ourselves. Because the costs of his programs will crush our economy and render us impotent as a nation before the onslaught of terrorist nations, if this is what we can expect from him I say don’t let him in the white house.

It was Obama’s assertion that “[he’s] offered spending cuts above and beyond” the expense of his promises that I find silly knowing that that is only accepted only by his partisan followers. His vow to save money by “eliminating programs that don’t work” masks his failure throughout the campaign to specify just what those programs really are — He must know the withdrawal of troops from Iraq won’t give but a small amount of savings because, even withdrawals cost as much to do as increases.

Here are some excerpts of what we heard in the self agrandizing ad, and what he never intended us to know or realize:

THE LIE is plainly visible “That’s why my health care plan includes improving information technology, requires coverage for preventive care and pre-existing conditions health care costs for the typical family by $2,500 a year.”

But the real FACTS are: that this plan does not lower premiums by $2,500, or any set amount for that matter. He simply hopes that by spending $50 billion over five years on electronic medical records and by improving access to proven disease management programs, among other steps, which is not a bad thing, that consumers might end up saving money. He uses an optimistic analysis to suggest cost reductions in national health care spending could if it works amount to the equivalent of $2,500 for a family of four. A lot of economists are very skeptical that those savings can ever be achieved, but even if they could, it’s not a certainty by any observable standard that every dollar would be passed on to consumers in the form of lower premiums. After all when was the last time you ever saw a hospital give back profits from its coffers?

THE LIE: “I also believe every American has a right to affordable health care.”

THE REAL FACTS: That a belief in something cannot be confused with a solid guarantee of health coverage for everyone in America. He makes no such promise because he knows full well it’s simply “Political Spin Doctoring” that he’s doing. He even said as much in the ad when he said about the problem of the uninsured: “I want to start doing something about it.” He would mandate coverage for children but not adults.” His program is aimed at making insurance more affordable by offering the choice of BIGGER government-subsidized coverage similar to that in a plan for federal employees and other steps, including requiring larger employers to share costs of insuring workers OR “Spreading the Wealth around” socialistic style.

THE POLITICAL SPIN that he does so well is: “I’ve offered spending cuts above and beyond their (My Promises) cost.”

But the real FACTS are that Independent analysts say that both Obama and Republican John McCain would deepen the deficit with their plans on healthcare. The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates Obama’s policy proposals would add a net $428 billion to the deficit over four years — and that analysis accepts the savings he claims from spending cuts. The nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, whose other findings have been quoted approvingly by the Obama campaign, says: “Both John McCain and Barack Obama have proposed tax plans that would substantially increase the national debt over the next 10 years.” The analysis goes on to say: “Neither candidate’s plan would significantly increase economic growth unless offset by spending cuts or tax increases that the campaigns have not specified.” and we know that John McCain would not raise taxes it goes against every fiber of his being, BUT he did say that he would CUT OUT A LARGE SUM OF NON WORKING PROGRAMS that cost us BILLIONS upon Billions that Obama will not!

THE Half truths are evident: “Here’s what I’ll do. Cut taxes for every working family making less than $200,000 a year. Give businesses a tax credit for every new employee that they hire right here in the U.S. over the next two years and eliminate tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas. Help homeowners who are making a good faith effort to pay their mortgages, by freezing foreclosures for 90 days. And just like after 9-11, we’ll provide low-cost loans to help small businesses pay their workers and keep their doors open. “

THE FACTS ARE very different from His proposals — those tax cuts he talks about, those low-cost loans he promises, the $15 billion a year he promises for alternative energy, and more — will cost lots and lots of money. Our country will be facing a record $1 trillion deficit next year if unattended by fiscal responsibility. Indeed, Obama recently acknowledged this — although not in his commercial — that: “The next president will have to scale back his agenda and some of his proposals.” It’s funny that he doesn’t seem to care about his math equations when he’s spinning his yarn about his promises but the math will come home to roost if he has his way, can we afford to believe a promise without good math? This is an attempt to have an OUT when the plan fails which it surely will.

So what is Socialism?

It is a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole. It has NEVER WORKED in history so it remains a theory untested.

(in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles. DID YOU GET THAT CLEARLY? Socialist practices are the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, IS THIS OBAMAS HIDDEN PLAN? To turn our great country toward COMMUNISM our mortal enemies…say it isn’t so.

A text by Henry Sidgwick which examines socialist economics, originally published in 1886 in The Contemporary Review.

John McCain’s Weekly Radio Address is destined to become the great “I told you so” of history future as he lays out why Senator Obama’s economic plan is a socialist plan, and why that would harm our economy.

You see, he believes in redistributing wealth, not in policies that help us all make more of it. Joe, in his plainspoken way, said this sounded a lot like socialism. And a lot of Americans are thinking along those same lines. In the best case, “spreading the wealth around” is a familiar idea from the American left. And that kind of class warfare sure doesn’t sound like a “new kind of politics.”

This would also explain some big problems with my opponent’s claim that he will cut income taxes for 95 percent of Americans. You might ask: How do you cut income taxes for 95 percent of Americans, when more than 40 percent pay no income taxes right now? How do you reduce the number zero?

Well, that’s the key to Barack Obama’s whole plan: Since you can’t reduce taxes on those who pay zero, the government will write them all checks called a tax credit. And the Treasury will cover those checks by taxing other people, including a lot of folks just like Joe.

In other words, Barack Obama’s tax plan would convert the IRS into a giant welfare agency, redistributing massive amounts of wealth at the direction of politicians in Washington. I suppose when you’ve voted against lowering taxes 94 times, as Senator Obama has done, a new definition of the term “tax credit” comes in handy.

At least in Europe, the Socialist leaders who so admire my opponent are upfront about their objectives. They use real numbers and honest language. And we should demand equal candor from Senator Obama. Raising taxes on some in order to give checks to others is not a tax cut it’s just another government giveaway.

What’s more, the Obama tax increase would come at the worst possible time for America, and especially for small businesses like the one Joe dreams of owning. Small businesses provide 16 million jobs in America. And a sudden tax hike will kill those jobs at a time when need to be creating more jobs.

Fortunately, America has an alternative to the phony tax cut my opponent started talking about only months ago. The McCain-Palin tax cut is the real thing. Among our other serious tax reforms, we’re going to reduce every income tax bill in America, and double the child deduction for every family. We will cut the capital gains tax. And we will cut business taxes to help create jobs, and keep American businesses in America.

As Joe the Plumber has now reminded us all, America didn’t become the greatest nation on earth by letting government “spread the wealth around.” In this country, we believe in spreading opportunity, for those who need jobs and those who create them. And that is exactly what I intend to do as President of the United States.

Obama’s Economic Equity (read: SOCIALISM)

Why Socialism Failed: A must read!

Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani at the 2008 Republican National Convention.

Socialism equals economic catastrophe! Venezuela’s about to be flushed away!

What is Socialism and why in the WORLD do we need it?

Meantime, Barna says 63 percent of “evangelicals” are supporting McCain, while 23 percent who probably don’t care that God hates what Obama loves are supporting Obama. “Evangelicals” meet the “born-again” criteria, plus seven other conditions, including the belief that salvation is only possible through grace, not works. ALL of this proves NOTHING as God does NOT judge us by what WE DEFINE as Christian which is based solely by our OWN CHURCH CREEDS and even if we use the Bible to say it we must only rely on our personal actions which ALWAYS SPEAK LOUDER THAN OUR CREEDS.

According to Dave Kinnaman, president of The Barna Group, born-again Christians voting for Obama say they are backing the Illinois senator because they believe he will do a better job restoring America’s reputation and handling the economy and agree with his stance on the Iraq War.

“People in their 20s or 30s who are born-again Christians are more likely to support Senator Obama than Senator McCain, compared to people who are older born-again Christians, who are more likely to support the Arizona senator,” he explains. “So, when you look at it, it’s a pretty complex set of reasons, and each person comes to this voting decision with their own unique sensibility, but what’s interesting is the Christian community, compared to previous elections, is more open to this Democratic candidate than we’ve seen in at least the last couple national elections.”

Kinnaman says it is important to keep in mind that only one in every ten voters is an evangelical Christian with a biblical worldview and understanding of what it means to be a follower of Christ. You see this is the MAIN REASON the world looks at the church with rolled eyes in the back of their heads, we can’t follow simple biblical instructions to pray for direct guidance as to who to vote for. I did and God said McCain / Palin the best choice between the two. Does that mean they WILL WIN? NO, it does not mean that at all, because people are STUPID in the church and out of the church……its simply a matter of digging for information as in my blog yesterday about “Googling Obama and Biden” their records are as McCain and Palin have been saying for weeks but people are so Lazy in America and will fall for the first speech that sounds at least close to what they believe from memory that God said. That’s the state of the Christian church and pastors have become petty baby sitters for those in the pews. It should never have come to this point, Obama should have set off so many red flags by now that no one would vote for him.

It is scary to see so many Americans following someone “blindly”…their choices being made based on one’s charm and empty promises. Instead of favoring someone because of their moral character and dedication to their country, so called “born-again Christians” are so easily influenced by a charismatic speaker. What happened to trusting God to supply our needs? No man is going to be able to save us from our economic mess. Americans have turned from God and have put their trust in materialism. Their votes are coming from their wallets, not their faith and trust in God. God have mercy on our nation if we choose such an ungodly man to lead us.

Bringing back God to this country requires that we realize that not everybody that said Lord, Lord will enter into the kingdom of God, at least at the end there is real justice.

This is truly awful. Obama is not a real Christian because his policies and beliefs and ACTIONS and ASSOCIATIONS are not Christian. Read your bible people! If you think Obama is a Christian you are grossly deluded and have a sickening weak view of scripture, and are acting in the spirit of 2 Tim 4:3-4. Obama is the opposite of Christ and spewing myths in nearly every teaching of his–that aligns him more with the Antichrist than the Christ BY FAR. UCOC’s black liberation theology is heresy and not Christian. BHO never denounced Wright until it was politically expedient to do so. BHO is a dangerous hard-left socialist masquerading as a moderate that unrepentant and passionately desires limitless taxpayer-funding abortion and the gay agenda. HOW CAN A PERSON GET ANY further from Biblical truth, WITHOUT BEING THE DEVIL HIMSELF?

I believe that if a person is truly “born-again”, then they must pray for wisdom on who to cast their vote for. There are certain very basic principles that can offer guidance, but in this election. Which proposition is questionable. It is clear that we are not to judge one another in our personal walk with God however, and if we see a brother (or sister) taken in a fault we are to pray, lest we by likewise trapped. I am going with the candidate who supports life for all life (including THE not yet born).

At the most profound level of insight, all our problems in this country are rooted in spiritual apostasy. The church is apostate, so it allows the culture to become heavily influenced by SICK PRACTICES JUST AS LOT ALLOWED HIS NEIGHBOURS TO DO WHAT HE DID NOT LIKE BECAUSE HE WAS AS MOST ARE A SPIRITUAL COWARD. Since the “church” has, in turn, been further co-opted by the culture, it walks in utter confusion. Nothing could demonstrate that more clearly than the relatively high percentage of professing “Christians” who favor Obama, a man who legally promotes the American holocaust of infants…nearly 50,000,000 babies slaughtered and counting. That is eight times the number of Jews the monstrous Hitler murdered in concentration camps during WWII. Those “Christians” who vote for Obama are by so doing clearly marking themselves out as pagan hypocrites guilty of mass murder, AND I CAN SAY THIS BECAUSE I WAS A PERSONAL EXAMPLE OF THIS SO-CALLED CHOICE BEFORE I WAS ADOPTED. The only thing that stood between me and the doctors butcher knife was a “Pro-lifer” doing a great American thing “Warning of Murderers within these walls”and the rest is history.

This Evangelical Christian is not voting for either McCann nor Obama, neither one is worthy of my vote. And before anyone says I have to vote to keep Obama out, I will add that I am from a predominately Democratic district – Obama already has a lock on the electoral vote regardless of what I, or my fellow Republicans, do.

2 Thess 2:9-11 “For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie 12 and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness. 13 But we ought always to thank God for you, brothers loved by the Lord, because from the beginning God chose you to be saved through the sanctifying work of the Spirit and through belief in the truth. 14 He called you to this through our gospel, that you might share in the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. 15 So then, brothers, stand firm and hold to the teachings we passed on to you, whether by word of mouth or by letter.” What else can be said?

Young people today are just plain victims of the leftist ideologies and brainwashing effects of postmodern relativism and multiculturalism. This has been the agenda of the left since the Italian communist Antonio Gramscith. promoted the idea of infiltrating America’s media, education system, government offices, churches, etc to propagate atheism, communism and socialist ideas into the heads of our youth They are succeeding. When the youth of our churches are willing to vote for a man being used by the spirit of antichrist, the church has failed miserably with another generation, just as it did with my baby-boomer generation. Wake up church, it is not time for seeker friendly, emergent church, gospel lite. These and the liberal leftist formerly main line denominations have diminished the Gospels relevance ane effectiveness. Wake up!!!

He may say that he is a Christian, but I refuse to support anyone who believes that its ok to kill unborn children for any reason outside of incest which is rare. Abortion is from satan, who is a thief and a killer. Jesus came so that you may have life, and have it more abundantly. Some people may say that its a more complex issue, but studies have shown the psychological effect it has on a women when she has an abortion, but they don’t care about women JUST THEIR AGENDAS.

Anyone who votes for Obama, a man who advocates the killing of babies, is not a Christian. “And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.'” Matthew 7:23 Just because you say you are a Christian doesn’t mean you are. Obama will get votes from many, and many will say they are Christians & they are Christians just like Obama ISN’T – voting to kill thousands of innocent babies WHICH IS WHAT YOU DO BY THE ASSOCIATION OF YOUR VOTE, and those that do that will only answer to God.

Remember that the Roman Empire was built by men who were able to create a great infrastructure and economy and yet under their authority Christ was crucified, Christians were persecuted and the Empire eventually fell. Voting for Obama based on his charismatic charm is dangerous given all he truly stands for. There is nothing in his record to suggest he will serve God first if elected President. Remember, the serpent was very beguilling when he convinced Eve to throw away her relationship with God and look where that got us all.

PLEASE! Lets just stop calling non-Biblical people Christians. It is a slap in the face for the few of us, a spit in the face to our Christ, Jesus and an insult to God, The Creator, Our Father in Heaven WHO MAKES THE RULES FOR GOING TO HEAVEN. They are what they are because they worship the inventions and follow the intentions of man rather than the Very (literal) Word of God. We expect this kind to vote for baby killers, liars cheats and thieves. BUT PLEASE STOP CALLING THE MULTITUDE THAT FOLLOW THE ANTI-CHRIST SPIRIT, CHRISTIANS!

This reminds me of Malachi 2:17, when the people ask, “How have we tired the LORD?” and the answer is by saying that everyone who does evil is good in the sight of the LORD, and he delights in them, or by asking, “Where is the God of justice?” Well, the God of justice is found in the famous Jesus quote about false believers crying out, “LORD, LORD! We did many things for you.” But Jesus will reply, “Away from me, workers of iniquity — I never knew you!” Saved people do not defend immorality while silencing Bible teachings. Phoney Christians do.

PRACTICING orthodox Christians uphold the Word of God and do not put personal political preferences ahead of God’s Word. God’s position is very clear about the execution of life within the womb and without. Jesus said, “By their fruits you will know them”. Whether or not this information is designed to malign “Born Again Christians” as hypocrites, the end game is the same….you cannot claim that you are a practicing Christian if you disregard what God has said in Scripture and prove it with your actions, namely, voting for a rabid INFANTICIDE promoter…Barak Obama! In Corinth, the apostle Paul faced the same kind of immature and carnal Christians during his missionary journeys. In 1 Corinthians chapter 1, Paul speaks against their intellectual pride, social evils, and their glorying in worldly wisdom.

These people are Blind. Obama is an “empty suit”, with big promises.He can give a good speech and people fall for it. He has “NO” experience and he hates the Military (something that is necessary). How can you support a man that is FOR abortion, and gay marriage. The Bible, is very plain, about both of these.

I am also a Born Again, Baptized, Believer and based my last Presidential election vote, solely on the alignment with the Evangelical standards of upholding the teachings of Jesus in society. I can truly say that in my lifetime, I have never seen or felt the overwhelming spirit of despair and depression and lack of respect by other nations and people as I have witnessed in these past four years. If a change doesn’t come, we will not survive and be known as the greatest nation in the earth.

Can we expect more from a generation brought up in liberal public schools during the day and video games at night, or possibly from broken homes where the religious house was perhaps divided? A person will have the best background in Biblical concepts when they have the opportunity to get totally absorbed in the Word periodically. That is hard to imagine in today’s fast paced, running from one event or activity to another world, even if some of those events include “church”.

Matthew 12:33 “Make a tree good and its fruit will be good, make a tree bad and its fruit will be bad, for a tree will be recognized by its fruit. You brood of vipers you who are evil say anything good? For out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks. Don’t blame me for those words, I did not say them, The Holy one of Israel said them. And I am allowed to be a fruit inspector. Show me your works!

Two things . . . they do not understand what he is and stands for and they have no concept what it means to be “Born Again”. How can they support a man and Party Platform that will allow what the Scripture stands so firmly against? A True follower of the Lord Jesus,who is informed on whats going on,on a global scale will refuse to the let the media do their thinking for them. It’s not just about my pocket book, it about a country who My Heavenly Father has truly blessed, and our politicians thumb their nose at God as if though they know better.

It’s always made me wonder how Christians can look the other way when it comes to abortion and Senator Obama’s blatant stance on the issue. We know that life is precious and that the issue of the economy or the war in Iraq take a back seat to what is within our control to protect with our choice in candidates. I pray every day that God’s people will wake up and stand firm for what’s really at stake here.

I am appalled at this number. Do these few “born-again” christians (ie..like Christ) really believe that God is not in control? God is not setting aside His beliefs so why should His children. Abortion is still murder and homosexuality is still an abomination to Him. God’s grace and mercy are indeed new everyday but we have to obey His commands. His kingdom come, His will be done on this earth as it is in Heaven. Have Mercy Dear Lord on this nation, in Jesus’s name amen.

“Obama has softened his stance on abortion”… Right! He has THE most radical view on abortion – even supporting partial birth abortion – a practice so horrible, I hesitate to even mention it. He voted against the “born alive” act when it was presented in the Ill. Legislature – even arguing against it. Now he lies about his reasons. NO ONE Says they want more abortions… But his policies will encourage them.

Indeed, 2 Timothy 4:3-4, and 2 Timothy 3:1-5 have been fulfilled before our very eyes.

Jesus said: “Why do you call me ‘Lord, ‘Lord,’ and don’t do the things I say?” A vote for Obama is a vote against what Jesus taught.

Obama softens to anything that will gain his points with voters…you cannot be a true Christian and follow after someone with the beliefs of this man. His appointment to the highest office in the United States will surely be the beginning of the end of Christian rights as we know it now.. God have mercy on us…

Why ‘born-again’ Christians are backing Obama? I know why, cause they are stupid!!!

FOOLS!

If Christians vote for obama, i would say that they aren’t Christians after all because Jesus will judge these sick actions of Obama and Biden NOT VOTE FOR THEM TO CONTINUE UNABATED.

Unbelievable! I just don’t know how people can support a candidate that is totally FOR abortion and the homosexual lifestyle as “the common way of life” when they are totally against who Christ, and therefore God, IS! God is a God of Grace, but He can’t be in the presence of SIN, and I think killing unborn babies and “men (and women) giving themselves over for unnatural relations” are both in The Bible as sin. All the other issues pale in comparison to these. Economics will work themselves out – they always do. Wars will end, but giving ourselves over to SIN is not an option.

You really can’t base your voting on “mans” desires, like the economy and the the reputation of America over abortion and traditional family values that line up with God’s Word. You’re representing Christ when you vote Tuesday, not your own worldly desires. Ask yourself: What would Jesus do? Do you really think Jesus would commend abortion and same-sex marriages? Wake up young people, you’re not voting for a person, you’re voting for a platform! God SAYS ABOUT abortion: What you do to the lesser and the helpless, you also do unto me.

THEY DO NOT KNOW WHAT THEIR BIBLE SAYS ???

These people have checked their Christianity at the BALOT BOX! Do not be deceived! LIFE ISSUES AND PROMOTION OF THE “CULTURE OF DEATH” CANNOT BE TRUMPED by social issues such as economics, health care, etc. Check again, CHRISTians! What would Jesus do???

I doubt the veracity of this poll. Very few Christians that I know are voting for Obama. I’m not voting for him either, because his values do not line up with those of God Almighty. I don’t know which god Obama serves, but It’s not the same one I serve!

there are still a lot of born again Christians supporting Obama who are much older than 30!!

“Righteousness exalteth a nation” (Prov 14:34). That means that if our leaders are Biblically righteous that God will take care of the other ailments of our country. Anybody who promotes or allows abortion, homosexuality and same sex marriages just so they can be elected will bring our nation down. Historically, this has always been the case, as in Sodom and Gomorrah (Gen 19), Canaan, (I Kings 14:24), Rome (Romans 1:26-32). If we will learn from history, we will steer away from its failures. If we refuse to learn from history, we are doomed to repeat it!

It’s so important to keep our priorities lined up with God’s heart. Yes, the economy is bad. However,God provides all of our needs and is our source. He is faithful. Unborn babies/babies who survive abortion and need medical attention need us to speak for/protect them. Abortion has become birth control. It should never be acceptable for a true Christian. My vote goes to Pro life candidates. I believe God will honor that choice. He is soverign.

This is why the church has no ministry in this country. Too many people who claim to be with God but are so apathetic that they can’t even take God’s word into account when they vote. How simple is that and how little effort does that require and yet HALF the church can’t do it? This is why I have a hard time going to church. It’s DEAD! Half the people in any given church could care less about the heart of God and His will.

If you are a christian – you will not vote for Obama – if you know God’s word you would not even consider it. He has so many issues that are not of a Christian. People need to wake up and investigate this guy. See for yourself. Abortion, Homosexuality, What does your Bible say on these issues.

I think Senator Obama not only lacks experience but he is a threat to our freedoms and many things that made our Nation great. I want our children to have a better life but I don’t think the Obama ticket will make sure that happens.

It is unbelievable to me that a true believer and follower of Jesus Christ could ever vote for a man that would not protect innocent human life. A man that would not protect the sacred gift of life for ALL humans, in my opinion, is not fit to lead this country in the way our forefathers intended and certainly not Biblical the way God intends. Economy is nothing when all morality and protection of human beings fail.

Obama with his charisma to draw the people to follow him & support him will be the Anti-Christ that the Bible speaks of in The Book of Revelation. The man will be in his 40’s and of Islamic faith.

It is very hard for me to believe, that a true believer, could compromise their faith and vote for a man who doesn’t care about The Lord Jesus or His Word. To these people, they need to look at the Word and judge themselves- a believer or -not a believer! If the Holy Spirit is alive in them , they would not vote FOR Obama no matter how old they are!——–not lookin’ back

You cannot serve God and Money. Sooner or later, you will have to choose.

The Bible is our sound counsel to help determine their selection for President. Christians who hold the Scriptures as the authority in their lives could NOT vote for Obama. Obama stance on abortion. He has a deal with Planned Parenthood that on top of his list is to implement the Freedom Of Choice Act which is the most disgusting Act I have ever read regarding abortion. This bill will FORCE doctors and nurses and religious hospitals opposed to abortion to participate in these abortions and surviving babies must be allowed to die!! Our tax dollars will also fund this horrendous act and Planned Parenthood is salivating. John McCain’s remark posted here pales in comparison to the man with a steel heart.

Christian’s will answer to God about the choices they make what ever they are!

Restore this country’s reputation?? His policies and philosophies go against everything that the founding fathers fought and died for. A better job handling the economy?? With the C.E.O.s from Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae as his Financial Advisors—give me a break!! His stance on the Iraq War?? His plan (as stated in the first presidential debate) is to pull our troops out of Iraq and re-deploy them to Afghanistan. That’s not ending war; it’s just moving it somewhere else.

I reject the notion that many born again believers are backing Obama. His vote to deny babies born alive in a botched abortion any medical aid and just let them die shows what a cold heart he has. Anyone with a heart for the Lord could never vote for him as they would be a partaker of his deeds.

We as Christians need to vote on the moral issues and believe that God will give our new president the wisdom to take care of the rest of the issues. Such as the economy, jobs, war, and fuel. Too many Christians are only worried about the economy and willing to take some of the bad for that purpose. It is idolatry when you put faith in a man and not on GOD himself.

While some may call themselves “Christians” if they vote Obama, its obvious they are NOT voting from a biblical worldview, but a post-modern worldview. Voting their pocketbook, voting very fleshy perspectives, but definitely NOT voting biblical worldviews.

How can someone who claims to be a Born again Christian vote for someone who is so anti-Christ, in his deeds. “Because of the increase of wickedness the love of most will grow cold” Matthew 24:12. I think you are not Born-again if you don’t follow God’s Word to the Letter.

Those who have grown up under socialism, and know first hand how it oppresses, especially people of faith. Christians who support Obama are either naive, deluded, or ignorant.

James 1:21-23 Therefore put away all filthiness and rampant wickedness and receive with meekness the implanted word, which is able to save your souls. But be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving yourselves. For if anyone is a hearer of the word and not a doer, he is like a man who looks intently at his natural face in a mirror. How can a Christian vote for aborting babies or supporting homosexuals? This grieves the heart of God, but instead, their vote depends on what’s in their wallets and what make the day to day life easier. These people are false Christians. You can’t vote against what God sees as important and call yourself a Christian. But, then again, look at what church’s today are teaching, false, watered down doctrine.

First of all we have to ask ourselves are these individuals really born again christians or are they just saying they are? If you look at their reasons for voting for Obama you have to wonder because all their reasons are worldly. I am a born again christian and I personally cannot vote for Obama because when I go to the poll to vote I vote for Jesus Christ my lord and saviour and the rest will take care of itself. The state of this country will not change unless we as christians focus on the Saviour and not the world. So killing babies is not Godly and homosexuality is not Godly so the born again christians who are voting for Obama because he can turn the economy around might just end up with the exact opposite.

Sad for those Christians who will be influenced and led astray by their worldly/self-centered thinking and not God’s principles to influence them to vote for a heretic – God will judge

No Support here for Liberal agendas…..ever! NO CONCESSION is allowed on my blog!

I for one WILL NOT SUPPORT OBAMA as President or otherwise ( Meaning that I’ll do my civic duty as always but I’ll HOLD Liberals to their word and support ONLY obedience to all those promises….nothing more nothing less )….WHY? You say!….Well its very simple my Friend, nothing I’ve said about him is UNTRUE Its totally factual and WILL NOT CHANGE after the election. No matter what ANYONE including you Liberal Nut-Jobs who NOW AFTER you have spilled your sick vomit of hate toward good people, all of a sudden now you want the “Hate speech to stop” [Remember to a Liberal what hate speech is: “Revealing the facts that obscure the landscape of Liberal thought!” But to us who think for ourselves “Hate Speech” means remarks or Language that is inappropriate to use in a logical discussion of any subject, that demeans or otherwise hurts that persons character.] John McCain and Palin have been degraded and maligned over and over again, without so much as an apology because to a Liberal just like an Atheist there are no boundaries in speech because if you cannot WIN AN ARGUMENT THEN INSULTS AND CHARACTER ASSASSINATION RULE THE DAY!. BUT NOW the Liberals want to change things and NO MORE FACTS AND TRUTHS can be brought out against Obama (The One!). So WHAT? You’ll suddenly show your Socialism and LOCK UP THE ONES WHO SPEAK OUT? Go ahead but you’ll have to KILL THIS SPEAKER because I will never stop saying the truth about the Liberal left-headed loons AND THOSE WHO HATE GOD…so TOUGH! BUT BEFORE YOU LIBERALS SMILE WITH GLEE REALIZE THIS RIGHT NOW: These Liberals are never going to KEEP the promises they’ve made, they cannot keep them because socialistic policies don’t work. Another thing is clear here that these Liberals MUST DO WHAT THEY SAY OR LOSE THE NEXT ELECTION IN A LAND SLIDE…..think about it Lib’s now you MUST put your CONSIDERABLE money where your CONSIDERABLE BIG MOUTHS ARE, no one else can be blamed but yourselves from this point forward…..No Bush, No Cheney, NO REPUBLICANS AT ALL TO BLAME! And while we regroup for the comeback in 2012 just before the world ends on the Mayan calender your guys will be struggling to LOOK LIKE your doing just a little bit of what you promised, can you say embarrassed! Its all going to be BASED not on your smoke and mirrors, but on WHAT HAVE YOU DONE THESE LAST 4 YEARS? For once I’ll be smiling and saying “How you gonna answer that, because I know for a fact that Liberals cannot change their spots”…”once a liberal ALWAYS a Socialist”

Obama Gives $27,000 to Racist Pastor

Glenn Beck Exposes Obama’s Secret: A ‘Closet’ Racist

Barack Obama An Unknown Politician Seeks To Become Our Next President, But What Do We Know About Barack Obama…..No more than day one except for these little issues.

If you thought you knew Barack Hussein Obama & might be considering voting for him, THINK AGAIN!!! Truth is that there is a lot to know about this candidate before you vote! Then decide for yourself.

BE SURE TO CLICK ON THE FOLLOWING LINKS (or copy & paste) to learn more about Barack Hussein Obama!

http://www.theobamafile.com/(a MUST READ timeline with shocking details about OBAMA!! TONS of stuff to click on in here! BE INFORMED! READ THIS ~ it’s well worth it!) A privileged African-American, who has not shared the black American experienceBy birth, blood and training, a Muslim, who has been a member of a Black-African church for 20 years

A socialist whose politics are rooted in Marx and whose tactics were conceived by Alinsky

A master at shaping his own mythology and completely unqualified to be Commander in Chief.

http://islamichope.org/

(why is Obama shown at the top of this web page in this group photo?!)

MSNBC’s Chris Matthews lays into Obama supporter Texas Senator Kirk Watson who can’t name even one of Obama’s legislative accomplishments!

Why would anyone want to vote for Barack Hussein Obama when he obviously lacks the experience & accomplishments necessary to run for president!

Well there you have it a DO NOTHING POLITICIAN with no history of accomplishment to speak in his entire political career, a sitting Governor OF Alaska has still got FAR MORE experience and better values than him. I mean please…his OWN SUPPORTER WAS BLANK ON HIS ACCOMPLISHMENTS what does this say about a man who has entered into an office where we all really need a “DO SOMETHING” man?…..but you guys seem to think that he’ll somehow over the course of a couple of months become “Kennedy” instead of “Stalin”, you’ve totally ignored all the warnings + all the facts and went with a no win situation for America……your more likely to win the lotto and I pray you don’t gamble for a living, because your going to lose your pants and your economy because this is the plan for “The one world government” to take over its biggest enemy the U.S.of A.. What Americans have done is Voted their pocketbooks instead of hearts and that is just pure GREED not common sense, and all this time your real enemies were not McCain or Palin but your very own LACK OF FORESIGHT.

Good Anger

“A man that does NOT know how to BE ANGRY,does NOT know how to be GOOD”

In this time of much fear and Loathing in Washington, and let me be clear that the Republican Party messed up in a major way and I believe heads should roll at the TOP of the parties set up process. BUT Sarah Palin is not to blame for any of this and IF THEY TRY TO HANG HER OUT TO DRY because they can’t place the blame where it belongs, with those who advised McCain and Palin then- This Republican will become an independent and leave this party in support of her…..she was one of the greatest choices possible for McCain. And for his people [staffers] to even think of some of their stupid comments I’ve heard reveals a level of childishness unprecedented in this time of disunity and division instead of taking responsibility for their failures in his campaign, these people are no better than the other side of Liberals who eat each other up with “blame gaming” after the fact.

“No country upon earth ever had it more in its power to attain these blessings than United America. Wondrously strange, then, and much to be regretted indeed would it be, were we to neglect the means and to depart from the road which Providence has pointed us to so plainly; I cannot believe it will ever come to pass.”—George Washington, letter to Benjamin Lincoln, June 29, 1788

Romans 13 makes very clear cut statements about God and government leaders, as some believers have made a GRAVE ERROR concerning this election I thought it would be good to set the record straight about what the bible says about God’s WILL concerning Voting:

A Christian said :”I LIKE PALIN, BUT WHOEVER GODS WILLS TO BE IN OFFICE IS THE ONE THAT WILL GET IN”

The Biblical response to this silly reasoning is as follows:

It is not according to God’s will. That is a totally wrong interpretation of Romans 13. God allows humankind to select their leaders. Sinfulness will result in sinful leaders and vice versa. Check the history of the Israelites’ leaders and you will plainly see that God DID NOT MAKE THEM AS THEY BECAME, in fact He did not WANT THEM TO HAVE A KING IN THE FIRST PLACE. So why did HIS WILL not become law? Because God ALLOWS OUR CHOICE TO USURP HIS WILL but NOT without MUCH WARNING!  Nothing makes me madder than believers that know nothing of Scripture and its proper interpretation, for this is an area that religion has messed up peoples thinking.

Read this response from a friend of mine in Germany to a rare commentary by Joseph Farah’s wife in the WorldNet Daily website:Hi Mrs. Farah,

I have been a born again Christian since May 25, 1967 and have been exposed to many different Christian denominations (from extreme Bible fundamentalist to very liberal non-Biblical) and even a few cults. But I have never heard anything like this: “There is a teaching within the Christian community that God ordains all leaders who take political or religious office. The teaching goes like this: God is sovereign, which is to say, God has power to and does exercise His will and decree over all events in history. All societies need governance. Governments require leaders – these leaders are chosen by God and therefore, Christians (as well as all mankind) must respect and obey all leaders. The virtues espoused here are those of respect for authority and obedience to the law.” I have never read such until today. In order to understand the few verses in Romans 13 that you focused on trying to disprove them. That is dangerous territory. Those verses actually say that God permits or allows the political leaders and that His adopted children should obey them as long as they are not a terror to good works and doing evil. Verse 4 says that a ruler should me like a minister for God. So if the rulers don’t meet the indicated criteria, we don’t have to obey them, especially when they dictate or/and allow laws that go against The Ten Commandments and the New Testament Commandments. Romans 13 does not say that God chooses all of the rulers. Your title is ridiculous. Sinful people have allowed the bad people you mentioned to get in power. Have you ever heard of the saying “USA deserves the leaders it gets.”?

God has never approved or condoned sinful, wicked, or/and evil rulers. He has allowed them to come to power. Most of the past leaders are such because of the sinfulness of their promoters. We are in the Age of Grace, but all wrong rulers will have to be destroyed in the Lake of Fire (the Second Death). In the past, God has allowed some of them to be shamed or killed in horrible ways. Also do you remember in the Old Testament when the Israelites did not want to just trust in God and His representative Samuel, and demanded a king? So God did not want political leaders for His children because He wanted them to trust Him (the I AM). God’s top preference for us is inner self-governing with the help of the Holy Spirit and Jesus Christ (see John 16:13 and Proverbs 3:5-6) and is second preference is that we have righteous human rulers. Romans 8 and Galatians 5 indicate the two ways to live and there should be no ruler or law made against the fruit of the Holy Spirit. Jesus Christ and the Apostle Paul never preached about even being involved with human government, except in paying taxes. They had taught about qualities in Godly leadership and the wrongs of the spiritual leaders/teachers (like the Pharisees and the selfish unBilbical teachers in Paul’s time. True Christians will be wise voters and could be the best rulers or judges if they wanted. But I think that only 2% of the professing Christians are fully committed to God and the Bible. So that is why selfishness and hypocrisy are so common, especially in our human rulers and in most voters. I hope that you will learn more about the truths of God’s attributes and the truths of true Christianity so that you don’t misinterpret Scripture like you did in the commentary. God hates abortion and homosexuality. Which Political Party is for those two sins? God is also not for increasing the Federal Government or creating Socialism in the USA. And your husband has not suggested who might be the right Republican reformer to be nominated President in the next campaign 4 more years from now if the USA is not ruined before.

Concerned,Bible lover Bill

1 Timothy 2:1-6 (from the Lockman’s Foundation Amplified Bible)

“First of all, then, I admonish {and} urge that

petitions, prayers, intercessions,

and thanksgivings be offered on behalf of all men,

for kings and all who are in positions of high responsibility,

that [outwardly] we may pass a quiet {and} undisturbed life

[and inwardly] a peaceable one

in all Godliness {and} reverence and seriousness in every way.

For such [praying] is good {and} right,

and [it is] pleasing {and} acceptable to God our Savior,

Who wishes all to be saved and [increasingly] to perceive {and} recognize {and} discern

{and} know precisely {and} correctly the [divine] Truth.

For there [is only] one God, and [only] one Mediator between God and men,

the Man Christ Jesus,

Who gave Himself as a ransom for all

[a fact that was] attested to at the right {and} proper time.”

Jude (from the Lockman’s Foundation Amplified Bible)

“But you, beloved,

build yourselves up [founded] on your most holy faith

[make progress, rise like an edifice higher and higher],

praying in the Holy Spirit;

guard {and} keep yourselves in the love of God;

expect {and} patiently wait for the mercy

of our Lord Jesus Christ (the Messiah)–

[which will bring you] unto life eternal.

and on some have mercy and compassion who waiver {and} doubt.

[Strive to] save others, snatching [them] out of [the] fire;

on others have pity [but] with fear,

loathing even the garment spotted by the flesh

{and} polluted by their sensuality.”                                                                                                                                                                    Proverbs 3:5-6:

“Trust in the Lord

with all my heart, and

lean not on my own understanding

or past experiences;

in all my ways acknowledge Him

(be thankful to/for God),

and He (via the Holy Spirit) shall direct

my thinking and doing.”

Here are some comments from Topix: your town, your news, your take

“As a conservative Libertarian I have always felt that, for the most part my party stands for the original ideals of the Republican Party. But since Ike’s day I can’t tell what’s so different between the Republicans and the Democrats? Sure I can observe a few small differences but it seems to me that our Government has only grown and invaded our lives more and more since L.B.J. and BOTH parties have been responsible for this. Nixon’s “drug war” is a good example of how the Republicans began to increase the size of government. You could argue that Regan deregulated but his administration came with a healthy dose of scandal from Iran/Contra. I can’t imagine T.R. making back room deals with Iran after the hostage crisis. Since then I have seen the Republican party become heavily influenced by corporate America, a far cry from the Monopoly busting days of T.R. and more recently the influence of extreme religious organizations has further disrupted the formerly cherished ideals of a separation of church and state. McCain was an interesting guy. I would have voted for him in 2000 if he had got the nomination but that was a different McCain. W. has set forth a precedent whereby the “religious Right” has become a major player in the Republican Party and that’s a very bad thing. I just don’t see what’s worth believing in when it comes to either of the two parties and while I have expected to be disappointed with many Liberal ideals I’m more often shocked and sickened by these people who call themselves conservatives.””What happened to the Republican Party is we gave them both houses of Congress and the White House too. They weren’t used to being the controlling party and let the Democrats push them around. Instead of doing something about it, they adopted the Democrat’s way of doing things and squandered their opportunity away. They were like a person that has never had any money beyond paying bills and all of a sudden he comes into a lot of money. He goes ape and starts blowing money like mad and has no judgement on how to control himself. They forgot the job they were sent to Washington to do and the people who sent them there.”

As I said before, the Lib’s MUST DO WHAT THEY SAID and they have NO ONE to blame but themselves WHEN THEY FAIL as they have full advantage in both houses and the White House. So I say let them have all the rope they need to build their gallows high and fast.And please remember that THEY not us made the promises so it will be up to this inexperienced and unworthy man to fulfill them.

Just in case you missed the facts here are a few that Liberals cannot escape:

The “No, We Can’t!” Obamacrats: “Yes, We Can!” may be Obama’s campaign slogan, but defeatism is what he and his fellow Democrats are really about. Win the war in Iraq? No, we can’t! Become energy-independent by drilling at home and harnessing nuclear power? No, we can’t! And just to make sure we can’t, they put every possible legislative obstacle in our way.This is NOT change you can believe in, but then I knew that before wasting a vote.

Obama Spend-O-Rama: What will the Illinois Liberals 188 (and counting) spending proposals cost the nation? The media isn’t asking…what a surprise!

Canada, Here We Come: Many Americans can only shake their heads at the nutty excesses of multiculturalism in Canada, where “Human Rights Commissions” prosecute conservatives and Christians for “hate crimes” because they speak their minds about Islam or homosexuality. That kind of thing could never happen here, right? Wrong, the use of Canadian-style “commissions” to stifle free speech is already under way in some American cities and localities.

Government-Run Childhood: That, in essence, is what Barack Obama proposes in his “Zero to Five” plan — a collection of programs aimed at getting the government involved in the raising of your children literally from the moment they are born. Not only would his plan increase the incentives for mothers to put their children in someone else’s care — but parents who insist on caring for their own children will be taxed more to pay for it while getting nothing out of it.

Tax-Funded Jihad? Did you hear about the Muslim elementary school that was founded by two Muslim imams… is housed in the same building as a mosque… was named for the Muslim conqueror of Spain … and is supported by your tax dollars? Of course you didn’t….media doen’t ask!

“Declaration of Independence, 4 July 1776Reference: The Writings of Thomas Jefferson (Memorial Edition)

“Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”

This is some good advice for anyone wanting to wipe the floor with your debate opponent, especially Presidential Candidates not owned by Fannie Mae. Tell America where the facts are…Google them!It is so very simple to know who to vote for on November 4th Google the facts about Obama/Biden!!!!!

This video is an informative look at the factors that are causing our current financial and economic crisis. It discusses policy changes 13 years ago that unleashed the sub-prime mortgage-backed securities market, which accelerated prices erratically, inviting speculation and loose lending practices which were both condoned and encouraged by existing regulation and carried out by risk-blind executives and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Central to what socialism is, is its CLAIM to common ownership. This means the resources of the ENTIRE world would be owned in common by the entire global population, except for the undesirable such as “True Christians ” or anyone their glorious leader at the time doesn’t like. A pipe dream that has NEVER HAPPENED IN ANY SOCIALIST COUNTRY…KNOW WHY? The people who FORM the top echelon ALWAYS end up as the GREEDY DICTATORS (Hitler, Stalin, Marx ) that won’t share what WE ALL ARE SAID TO OWN and what you end up with is just Communism. No form of Government is perfect except God’s but at least as long as we do not become LAZY in this country we can KICK THEM OUT in time, but under these tyrants of socialistic dreaming there’s no possible relief but through DEATH or REBELLION which still ends in death for us!

Does it really make sense for everybody to own everything in common? Only if your master is Jesus Christ and you’ve renounced GREED but otherwise Of course not, some things ARE for personal consumption only, rather than to be shared as crumbs to those who don’t work and are lazy. The ideal for Capitalism is to be a helping hand, a beaken to the one below you on the economic scale to teach and nurture because Our forefathers fought and payed a hefty price for us to have the personal RIGHT to get richer and enjoy life to the fullest. The problem comes in ANY FORM of Government including socialistic ones when the individual(s) who lead BECOME GREEDY and go beyond the realm of helping their fellow man or women to achieve the same thing they achieved. If these socialist nut-jobs would be honest with themselves they have the exact same problem in their “Pipe Dream ” GREED destroys all people no matter how big the dream. It’s not about the wealth of others being to big, it’s about the fact that I am to lazy to work for what they have so I WANT THE GOVERNMENT TO “SPREAD THEIR HARD EARNED WEALTH TO ME SO I DON’T HAVE TO WORK HARD TO GET THERE, THAT’S JUST DOWN RIGHT WRONG! And I feel sorry and angry that Americans can’t see that for what it is….a major RIP-OFF in the making that will topple the America we know into a nation we sent our loved ones to defeat in two World wars and in Vietnam.

In practice (or “In Dreams”), common ownership will mean everybody having the right if their worthy by agreeing to the “status-quo” to participate in decisions on how global resources that now belong to others will be used, the very SAME thing could be said for our present state of Government. It means nobody being able to take personal control of resources, beyond their own personal possessions and that’s exactly where we are in Capitalism IF WE AS CITIZENS USE OUR PERSONAL AND COLLECTIVE RIGHTS AS THEY WERE ALWAYS MEANT TO BE USED, TO BETTER THE WORLD. Our forefathers gave us rights to BE ABLE TO DEPOSE “DICTATORS” who would misuse our personal resources (Our Money and personal freedoms) and to change to someone else who will do AS WE “WILL” to be done….that’s the real purpose of voting. It is not to allow a CHANGE OF GOVERNMENT (From Capitalism that works fine, but not perfect to Socialism that NEVER HAS WORKED) but a THE SIMPLE Change IN PERSONNEL (Presidents, Senators and Judges) TO ACCOMPLISH OUR common RIGHTS AS THE FOREFATHERS DEEMED NECESSARY.

They say that “Democratic control” is therefore also essential to the meaning of socialism, is that the kind of control that says “Do as WE say do, not as WE DO?” because I would love to see a time when “They” obeyed their own rules. Socialism’s DREAM IS TO be a society in which everybody will have the right to participate in the social decisions that affect them. This is what Voting ALREADY does, guess they missed that TRYING TO STEAL SO MANY VOTES to get their agendas out there? These decisions would be on a wide range of issues like how to organize the production of goods and services. Wow….seems to me that’s what we already have so why do we need to change to control our lives by a FEW who wouldn’t know freedom if it bit them in the ***. These people are unbelievable, they cry about injustice and then when their in control are the MOST unjust of all, aborting the most Innocent and helpless among us with excuse that its just to inconvenient for us to LET them live

Production under socialism is stated to be directly and solely for use, the use of those who agree with the top people otherwise your out of the social loop. With the natural and technical resources of the world held in common by the few at the top and controlled supposedly “democratically” more like communistic, the sole object of production would be to meet human needs. This would entail an end to buying, selling and money or Capitalism. Instead, we would take freely what we had communally produced but what is NOT said is just who is allowed to be in communion, that’s the real sticker. The old QUOTE from Carl Marx of “from each according to their ability to work for the state without pay, to each according to needs, taking from the communal pot after Marx TOOK HIS LARGE SHARE” would apply. Of course we all know where that led him (“FROM everyone MUCH FREE LABOR for those at the top [Marx and his cronies] and TO everyone WE deem worthy what they need, and if we need more there’s plenty of slave labor to get it from”)

So how DO THEY decide what human needs are? This question takes us back to their concept of democracy, for it is the “choices of this society that will reflect our needs” not what we deem we need. These needs will, of course, vary among different cultures and with individual preferences with the exception of any group or faith that resists losing their freedom as we know it. They can use our own democratic system WITH A LITTLE “CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN” to easily “Redesign” A NEW WORLD ORDER to provide for this internal variety. i.e. Abortionists, infanticide, and homosexuality to name a few.

Can we predict the exact form that would be taken by this future global democracy, yes the Obama/ Biden years. Their reinvented democratic system will itself be the outcome of future democratic decisions like this election as a stepping stone. All their decisions will be taken at a number of different levels from federal to state and from local governments to global intrusions on our soverentiy. This would help to “Redistribute” the democratic participation of every individual towards the issues that concern them personally like being “Baby Killer” “or Elderly Killer and getting Effeminate Rights pushed through” without a blocked path as it has now.

In socialism, so they say: everybody would have “free access” to the goods and services designed to directly meet their needs. WITHOUT a system of payment for the work that each individual contributes to producing them, in other words “NO MORE PAYCHECKS” every two weeks. All work would be on a voluntary basis…..until you refuse to work, then its prison work for you. “Producing for needs” means to these people that we would engage in work that has a direct usefulness to this body of misfits, serving God or saving the lives of the unborn, or helping the elderly to live out useful lives are not worthy endeavors to these Liberal loons who value ONLY their own opinions. The satisfaction that this would provide for those who are in the loop of socialism to come i.e Liberals and assorted other NUT JOBS, would begin to shape this nations “working patterns” and condition us all to fit their Liberal socialist agendas, this would bring about a mentality of “State owned” work slaves no better than those whom Marx and Hitler used for world domination at the expense of our proud National History and future as a WORLD POWER.

If you don’t believe me then look at a few of these “LEFTEST WEBSITES” listed here to get a taste of their vile infection spreading your wealth around their Marxist world view. I warn ya! It ain’t pretty or nice what they have planned for your family behind these “NICE SOUNDING MANTRAS” of socialistic drowning.

Why did SO-CALLED ‘born-again’ Christians back the non-Christian actions of Obama when they should have known better?

Watch this 7 part series, entitled “7 Reasons Why Obama Is Not A Christian,” done by the Christian Anti-Defamation Commission. This is living proof he is not saved as he THINKS!

Despite the real fact that Barack Obama approves of abortion and homosexual activism and fights to increase its occurrences nationwide, which in and of itself is truly appalling……some new polling by a prestigious Christian research group indicates that “The One” is making significant inroads among voters…… who are classified as “born-again” Christians although I doubt that they would know the TRUE JESUS if he visited their dead churches or dead lives for that matter.

The Barna Group for research says Obama is statistically tied (43 percent to 45 percent) with Republican John McCain among born-again Christian voters. “Born-again Christians” are defined by Barna as people who say they have made a personal commitment to Jesus and believe they will go to heaven because they have confessed their sins and accepted Jesus Christ as their savior. Based on that definition, 48 percent of all voters in this election will be “born-again” Christians, but we all know if we are honest that people LIE about their true status as Christians just to look good to other church people. This is the real issue that the church has NEVER DELT WITH….making sure of the salivation within its ranks and even if they really care about what God says!