Satan’s business and special gifts are in RELIGION of all kinds but he loves most too imitate and mock God in Christianized copycatting.


He was at one point the anointed Cherub in Heaven, it is thought that he led in worship and praise to God, and was endowed with the gifts of music. It follows then that his most marvelous works and endowments are in deception of religious form, music, and religious thought practices. He and his ministers are transformed as angels of light. So much ability they have in this regard that even the very elect could be deceived if it were possible. We are told that toward the end of the apostasy that satan and his ministers will perform great miracles before people even bringing fire down from the sky.

Since the mid-1800s, the system of theology known as dispensationalism has exerted great influence on how many Christians view the doctrines of ecclesiology and eschatology.

We must understand that those who strive to excel in these religious matters placesuper_smilies039 
themselves into the very domain where Satan has his greatest ability to deceive, mislead, and destroy. He wants all people to be very religious. This is his area of expertise and greatest goal. Remember, he wants to be worshiped as God. His goal for all people is to have them religious and to be worshipping him. He loves to get people reading the Bible (preferably one of his translations) so that he can mislead and corrupt their interpretations to the place that mankind will eventually be worshipping him. And remember, his ultimate goal is to have a “christian” (small “c”) religion worshiping him as the “Christ.” (anti-substitute Christ) And, of course, this one world “christian” religion will be violently opposed to the few bigots and intolerants who will not agree with them that all will go to Heaven, regardless.

Biblical theology and the rise of historicism,

explosion2_e0 all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of in the world. If any man have an ear, let him hear. Rev 13:8-9

Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron. 1 Tim 4:1-2

001352 unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter. Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight! Isa 5:20-21

In this New Age, REMEMBER, that all these scriptures and our understanding of theth_roadtohelleasytotravel working of satan as described, means that very religious people will be thinking that they are serving God and that the real Christians are totally wrong and going to Hell and are evil people, intolerant, and without any love for their fellowman. This will be the religious environment in the last days when Christ returns to defeat the antichrist.

This is a picture of the coming future in this New Age. It is a solemn and unique future. It is a future in which very religious men and all of society will have extremely twisted thinking, being totally deceived by satan. This is taking many years and generations to accomplish, but we can now see it coming together in our day. Through teaching demons even the popular Holy Bible is being wolf2
Rewritten with words redefined for popular consumption of the deceived masses throughout the world. Even today, all these changes are becoming obvious to only a very few. To His disciples our Lord said, “Woe unto you when all men will speak well of you, for so did their fathers to the false prophets” (Luke 6:26).

An understanding of hermeneutics (rational thinking applied to the Bible) will explain exactly how and why they will be deceived by this very religious satan. understanding the enemy, the child’s answer in simplicity to hermeneutics becomes clear.

Our enemy’s specialty and works have never changed since he first rebelled against God (Isa 14 and Ez 28) so that:

his attitudes and intentions are:
1. I will reign supreme instead of God;
2. I will make my own world and govern my own world;
3. I will seek my own glory and worship; and therefore
4. I will do as I please to have these with no regard to God and totally apart and against God, His attributes, His Will, or His Laws. Disobedience (rebellion) to God in all things will be my main agenda,

his manifest attributes and works then are totally opposite to God:
1. Instead of Love (unselfishness); I will be hate, being totally selfish and self seeking only.
2. Instead of Truth (reality under God); I will be lies, misinformation, and deception. Instead of Holiness (set apart, morally pure); I will be all things impure, all mixtures, total selfishness, falsehood with lying deception in all things, deceptive half truth compromise of equivocations, all confusion, and immorality.

Knowing all this about the supreme enemy of all sanity and rational thinking we now have a guide in hermeneutics (interpreting God’s Word). By going against all reality in refusing to recognize the Attributes of our true God our Creator, satan can inculcate some very clear assertions and guidelines into our deceived minds in understanding and receiving God’s Word, both in Living in His Son, and understanding His Word written on paper.

How does this understanding help us interpret the Bible?

Dispensationalism denies the Old Testament Law

Your eschatology informs your worldview

Hal Lindsey’s predictions of the end

Is Satan Alive and Well on Planet Earth?

What is the “Mark of the Beast”?

Why is 666 the “Number of the Beast”?

Are there one people of God or two?

Should we interpret Revelation “literally”?

Why is “audience relevance” important?

Is the “millennium” a literal 1000 years?

Second American Revolution: Gary DeMar (1 )

Second American Revolution: Gary DeMar (2)

Matthew 28: “Make disciples of ALL the nations”

What do “near, shortly, quickly” mean?

First, we clearly understand that the world system that is visible and we see and live in and in which we raise our families is satan’s kingdom, existing and flourishing in all the above principles of satan. last, if I say that every word (rhema) of His written Word (logos) is given to us by God and used of God for our eternal judgment for eternity, and that He holds His Word (collective written words) higher than His own Name (Psa 138:2), then His written words (rhema) must totally conform to every Attribute of Himself and totally opposite to every attribute of satan.

This means that His Word certainly will not, nor can be, interpreted as consistent with dictionaries, lexicons, and secular uses and meanings as the words may are given meaning by the world, because then they would be consistent with all deception, mixture, and impurity of its ruler, satan. This world’s popular high scholarship and linguistic corruption of language understanding, by mountains of multiple dictionary and Lexiconal meanings, obfiscate and confuse everybody, regardless of whether writing about the Bible words or not.

Then, our hermeneutic (interpretation method) must therefore, be based upon two principles. It must totally (1) conform to God’s Attributes, thus excluding those defined attributes and means of the enemy, to determine every single unequivocal root word meaning used by God, and (2) it must also utilize the specific grammar syntax of the languages in which God’s Wisdom chose to utilize to communicate to us in writing.

And to say that using one or more of the world’s specific languages to give understanding and thus willing choice to lost humans, is not appropriate for our Lord, then we must ask just how could it be done if blinded man are to get understanding, and likewise their good news be spread by them to others? gives us a very clear indication of what “the” good means of interpreting God’s Word must be. It must be completely different than any proposed or used by the world’s scholarship, whether traditionally in Biblical or secular linguistic traditions. It must totally (1) conform to God’s Attributes, thus excluding those defined attributes and means of the enemy, to determine every single univocal root word meaning, and (2) it must also utilize ONLY the specific grammar syntax of the languages in which God’s Wisdom chose to utilize.

We must now explain why a single univocal root word meaning must be utilized. God’s primary character Attributes are each unique, one of a kind, having no like or equal, univocal, and by which He rules the universe and under which all others subsume. They are Love, Truth, Wisdom, and Holiness. We might assume, as it seems, that all other character-istics of our Omnipotent-Omnipresent-Omniscient Father God subsume under these four primary Attributes.

We may say that we can interpret His peculiar Word (collective words) conforming to Love, Truth, and Wisdom as to the best of our ability. All truly sincere so-called “Christian” scholars may say this, regardless of their many disparate understandings of what it says. They may all say that, as best they could, these were their guidelines, that these guided their HOW as they interpreted His words (rhema), trying to discern HOW each word meaning supported His Love, Truth, and Wisdom. But HOW can we interpret His word according to the inherent Holiness of each of His single words? does HIS Holiness involve? How can Holiness determine our method? We know that Holiness involves as stated above: (1) purity (no mixture, uniqueness, having no like or equal, monadic, exists in distinction, univocal), and (2) morality (separate from the world) by upholding all the Attributes of God . How can this be applied to interpreting His written individual words? We have never heard of this being a standard of Biblical interpretation. Have you?

Instead of regarding His Word and, therefore, His individual words (rhema) as pure, unique, having no like or equal, as God’s Attributes, we hear that “all words are equivocal; the meaning depends upon their individual immediate use or context resulting in many different lexical or dictionary meanings and synonyms of every word.” Isn’t this the montra of every Seminary, Bible school, and self pronounced “answer man” in these last days?

But if we are going to make every single word conform to God’s Attributes, making them Holy, can they be properly regarded as mixtures, equivocal and imprecise, while having no like or equal in meaning, monadically Holy? We must surely think not. If they were equivocal, then they would not be Holy words, by definition.

Obviously, if each word was equivocal in meaning, then each word would conform to the standard of God’s enemy and not God. And if anyone would suggest that God may be using satan’s world uses and traditions of meanings to display His Attributes and Holiness for eternity, what does that say to any rational (noncontradictory) thinking person? In His very Eternal Holy Word that He esteems even above His Name, I doubt that our God would eternally memorialize anything of satan., by understanding satan’s strategy and attributes as opposed to God’s Attributes, we can clearly understand the difference between God’s means of understanding God’s words (rhema) and satan’s deception of how to understand them.
If someone were to rank the favorite words of contemporary thought, tolerance would be pretty high on the list. We often hear about the importance of respecting others and tolerating those with whom we disagree. In one sense tolerance is a very important virtue—we don’t use an Uzi to end an argument, for instance. Nor is it acceptable to burn down mosques or force dissenters to attend classes with which they disagree. The views of law-abiding people should be tolerated (i.e., they should not be violently suppressed), and their lives and property must be respected.

But the catch phrases and buzzwords we hear go beyond this simple truth. All too frequently the term “tolerance” is used as a synonym for “respect” or even “agreement.” And since Christians are characteristically unwilling to “respect” what they believe to be false doctrine or even (gasp) sin, they are, by means of this nifty equivocation, branded as intolerant and unenlightened.
One of the doctrines clearly taught in the Word of God is the unity of the Bride of Christ down through the ages. All flesh, that is mankind, has sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. The Lord Jesus Christ became incarnate and dwelt among us. He lived a perfectly sinless life. And then He died to atone for the sins of His People. He rose again as the firstborn from the dead that His people might follow when He raises them all and restores them to life on the Last Day. the mid-l800’s two false doctrines crept into the church that have since spread like cancer throughout Christendom. The first false teaching was Darwinism — the idea that all life on Earth arose from the same ancestral organism and that the fittest races of creatures evolve into higher beings but the unfit become extinct. Survival of the fittest is yet another form of the heresy of salvation by works. This seemingly harmless, if foolish, idea set the philosophical scene for a wicked deduction. If all creatures including man are evolving, and the fittest evolve the fastest by out-competing or even killing their competitors, then it stands to reason that some races of men have evolved to be superior to others. Hitler arrived at the natural conclusion of “survival of the fittest.” Superior races should eliminate the inferior ones.

While a genocidal take on Darwinism has in large part been repudiated by the world, the secular world still clings to the underlying premise: that mankind can and will evolve into a godlike creature, and some races of men are superior to others. As long as Darwinism is the accepted theory of origins, that society will risk arriving over and over again at Hitler’s conclusion: other races must be put to death.

Scripture easily exposes the blatant falsehood of this doctrine. God created all life (Genesis 1) and all men are descended from Adam. God made ALL of mankind in His Image, male and female He created them. After God judged the world through the Flood, again all men are descended from Noah. All men are under the rule of Christ the King. They will either be saved from damnation by the atoning blood of the Second Adam, Jesus Christ, or they will be sentenced to everlasting damnation.

We are told that in Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek, male nor female, slave nor free. This does not mean that Christianity is an egalitarian religion. The same Bible tells slaves to obey their masters, wives to obey their husbands, and acknowledges that the Word of God came first to the Jews. However, the passage teaches us that all of the descendants of Adam were made in the Image of God. In Christ all of the elect are restored to the Image of God regardless of our station in life. we see distinctions between the families or races of men it is not reason for boasting. God gives different gifts to different people individually. However, the Bible deals with families and nations of men through covenant. When a family or nation of men embraces a particular sin, God will judge them with a consequence that is often peculiar to that sin. We see great disparity in the world today, largely because some nations have embraced the gospel and produced Christian civilizations, while others have remained in darkness. Yet the tribes of the West were base barbarians and cannibals before the Word of God lifted them out of darkness. The Christian civilizations produced great wealth over the past few centuries, but now those nations have by and large turned away from the Word of God and embraced wickedness. We should expect to see those nations fall into darkness unless they repent. Likewise, if Africa and Asia, and South America fully embrace the Word of God, we should expect to see their cultures rise from darkness into light. The Bible teaches that there are only two races in the world, the elect and the damned.

A second false doctrine introduced in the middle of the 19th century was dispensationalism. This false teaching interprets the Bible to mean that God has two peoples: the Jews, and the Church (Gentiles). This teaching has sometimes said that the Jews were saved by obeying the Law and the sacrificial system, but the Gentiles are saved by the atoning blood of Christ. The Scriptures, however, are exceedingly clear that we are one people. I Corinthians 10:1-4 says, “Moreover, brethren, I do not want you to be unaware that all our fathers were under the cloud, all passed through the sea, all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea, all ate the same spiritual food, and all drank the same spiritual drink. For they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them, and that Rock was Christ.”

The common error of racism, racialism, and dispensationalism is the denial of the unity of the Body of Christ. Read in context, I Corinthians Chapter II is condemning exactly this, “For he who eats and drinks in an unworthy manner eats and drinks judgment to himself, not discerning the Lord’s body.”

Jesus Christ is not a polygamist. There is one Groom, and one Bride, made up of the elect of all generations from Adam until the last child is born upon the Earth. Galatians 3:29 tells us that, “And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.” Romans 11:16-I8 teaches, “For if the firstfruit is holy, the lump is also holy; and if the root is holy, so are the branches. And if some of the branches were broken off, and you, being a wild olive tree, were grafted in among them, and with them became a partaker of the root and fatness of the olive tree, do not boast against the branches. But if you do boast, remember that you do not support the root, but the root supports you.” continue to argue over the origin of dispensationalism. Those who are dispensationalists argue that the basic beliefs of dispensationalism were held by the apostles and the first generation church. Those who are not dispensationalists often argue that dispensationalism is a new theology that began in the 19th century. What is clear, though, is that dispensationalism, as a system, began to take shape in the mid-1800s.


1. John Nelson Darby


 Rapture Fever: Why Dispensationalism Is Paralyzed

 The application of the scriptures: A biblical refutation of dispensationalism beginning of systematized dispensationalism is usually linked with John Nelson Darby (1800-1882), a Plymouth Brethren minister. While at Trinity College in Dublin (1819), Darby came to believe in a future salvation and restoration of national Israel. Based on his study of Isaiah 32, Darby concluded that Israel, in a future dispensation, would enjoy earthly blessings that were different from the heavenly blessings experienced by the church. He thus saw a clear distinction between Israel and the church. Darby also came to believe in an “any moment” rapture of the church that was followed by Daniel’s Seventieth Week in which Israel would once again take center stage in God’s plan. After this period, Darby believed there would be a millennial kingdom in which God would fulfill His unconditional promises with Israel. According to Paul Enns, “Darby advanced the scheme of dispensationalism by noting that each dispensation places man under some condition; man has some responsibility before God. Darby also noted that each dispensation culminates in failure.”

Darby saw seven dispensations:

(1) Paradisaical state to the Flood;

(2) Noah;

(3) Abraham;

(4) Israel;

(5) Gentiles;

(6) The Spirit; and

(7) The Millennium. By his own testimony, Darby says his dispensational theology was fully formed by 1833.


2.The Brethren Movement first took shape in the Brethren Movement in early nineteenth century Britain. Those within the Brethren Movement rejected a special role for ordained clergy and stressed the spiritual giftedness of ordinary believers and their freedom, under the Spirit’s guidance, to teach and admonish each other from Scripture. The writings of the Brethren had a broad impact on evangelical Protestantism and influenced ministers in the United States such as D. L. Moody, James Brookes, J. R. Graves, A. J. Gordon & C.I. Scofield.0160_separator_snake_bar_ani4

3.The Bible Conference Movement Beginning in the 1870s, various Bible conferences began to spring up in various parts of the United States. These conferences helped spread Dispensationalism.

The Niagara conferences (1870—early 1900s) were not started to promote dispensationalism but dispensational ideas were often promoted at these conferences. The American Bible and Prophetic Conferences from 1878—1914 promoted a dispensational theology.


4. The Bible Institute Movement In the late 1800s, several Bible institutes were founded that taught dispensational theology including The Nyack Bible Institute (1882), The Boston Missionary Training School (1889), and The Moody Bible Institute (1889).


5. The Scofield Reference Bible

C. I. Scofield, a participant in the Niagara conferences, formed a board of Bible conference teachers in 1909 and produced what came to be known as, the Scofield Reference Bible. This work became famous in the United States with its theological annotations right next to the Scripture. This reference Bible became the greatest influence in the spread of dispensationalism.

6. Dallas Theological Seminary World War I, many dispensational Bible schools were formed. Led by Dallas Theological Seminary (1924), dispensationalism began to be promoted in formal, academic settings. Under Scofield, dispensationalism entered a scholastic period that was later carried on by his successor, Lewis Sperry Chafer. Further promotion of dispensationalism took place with the writing of Chafer’s eight-volume Systematic Theology.

“What is indisputably, absolutely, and uncompromisingly essential to the Christian religion is its doctrine of salvation… If
Dispensationalism has actually departed from the only way of salvation which the Christian religion teaches, then we must say it has departed from Christianity. No matter how many other important truths it proclaims, it cannot be called Christian if it empties Christianity of its essential message. We define a cult as a religion which claims to be Christian while emptying Christianity of that which is essential to it. If Dispensationalism does this, then Dispensationalism is a cult and not a branch of the Christian church. It is as serious as that. It is impossible to exaggerate the gravity of the situation.”

John H. Gerstner, Wrongly Dividing the Word of Truth: A Critique of Dispensationalism (Brentwood TN: Wolgemuth & Hyatt, 1991), 150. for those who call themselves Dispensationalists

If the dispensationalist will simply answer these honestly presented queries, we will be able to discern whether the accusations against dispensationalism are true –

1. Has the OT saint partaken of the blood of Christ shed for sins?

Then Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you. Whoever eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day.” -John 6:53-54

And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, blessed and broke it, and gave it to the disciples and said, “Take, eat; this is My body.” Then He took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, “Drink from it, all of you. For this is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.” -Matthew 26:26-28
2. Does the Spirit of Christ dwell in the OT saint?

“He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood abides in Me, and I in him.” -John 6:56

But you are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God dwells in you. Now if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he is not His. -Romans 8:9 Are ALL the saints of ALL the ages ONE BODY, drinking of the SAME Spirit?

The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? For we, though many, are one bread and one body; for we all partake of that one bread. -1 Cor 10:16-17

For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body– whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free–and have all been made to drink into one Spirit. -1 Cor 12:13
If one answers in the affirmative the above questions, one must abandon Dispensationalism.

If you do Congratulations, brothers and sisters in Christ, welcome to orthodox Christianity!

If one answers any of the above in the negative, then the accusations against dispensationalism are true, and we would ask that person to produce the means of the OT saints salvation! of On
The Power and Efficacy of Dispensationalism
The Ninety-Five Theses Against Dispensationalism